public inbox for linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] iomap, xfs: lift zero range hole mapping flush into xfs
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2026 05:13:23 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aagv8y96vGHvbOdX@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aacv39AZ5P9ubOZ5@bfoster>

On Tue, Mar 03, 2026 at 02:00:47PM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> Oh I see. If I follow the high level flow here, zoned mode always writes
> through COW fork delalloc, and then writeback appears to remove the
> delalloc mapping and then does whatever physical zone allocation magic
> further down in the submission path. So there are no unwritten extents
> nor COW fork preallocation as far as I can tell.

Yes.

> I think that actually means the IOMAP_ZERO logic for the zoned
> iomap_begin handler is slightly wrong as it is. I was originally
> thinking this was just another COW fork prealloc situation, but in
> actuality it looks like zoned mode intentionally creates this COW fork
> blocks over data fork hole scenario on first write to a previously
> unallocated file range.

Yes.

> IOMAP_ZERO returns a hole whenever one exists in the data fork, so that
> means we're not properly reporting a data mapping up until the range is
> allocated in the data fork (i.e. writeback occurs at least once). The
> reason this has worked is presumably because iomap does the flush when
> the range of a reported hole is dirty, so it retries the mapping lookup

Yeah.

> So the fix I posted works just the same.. lifting the flush just
> preserves how things work today. But I think what this means is that we
> should also be able to rework zoned mode IOMAP_ZERO handling to require
> neither the flush nor dirty folio lookup. It should be able to return a
> mapping to zero if blocks exist in either fork (allocating to COW fork
> if necessary), otherwise report a hole.

Yeah.  If there still is a delalloc mapping in the COW fork we could
actually steal that for zeroing.


  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-04 13:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-29 15:50 [PATCH v2 0/5] iomap, xfs: improve zero range flushing and lookup Brian Foster
2026-01-29 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] iomap, xfs: lift zero range hole mapping flush into xfs Brian Foster
2026-02-10 16:15   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-10 19:14     ` Brian Foster
2026-02-11 15:36       ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-13  6:06   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-13 17:37     ` Brian Foster
2026-03-02 19:02       ` Brian Foster
2026-03-03 14:37         ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-03 19:00           ` Brian Foster
2026-03-04 13:13             ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-03-04 14:17               ` Brian Foster
2026-03-04 14:41                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-04 15:02                   ` Brian Foster
2026-03-04 17:04                     ` Brian Foster
2026-03-05 14:11                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-05 15:06                         ` Brian Foster
2026-03-05 16:10                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-13 10:20   ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2026-02-13 16:24     ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-02-18 17:41       ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2026-01-29 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] xfs: flush eof folio before insert range size update Brian Foster
2026-02-10 16:16   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-10 19:14     ` Brian Foster
2026-01-29 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] xfs: look up cow fork extent earlier for buffered iomap_begin Brian Foster
2026-02-10 16:17   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-29 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] xfs: only flush when COW fork blocks overlap data fork holes Brian Foster
2026-02-10 16:19   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-10 19:18     ` Brian Foster
2026-02-17 15:06   ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2026-02-18 15:37     ` Brian Foster
2026-02-18 17:40       ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2026-01-29 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] xfs: replace zero range flush with folio batch Brian Foster
2026-02-10 16:21   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-10 19:19     ` Brian Foster
2026-02-11 15:41       ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aagv8y96vGHvbOdX@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox