From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 055F73A6F0C; Thu, 5 Mar 2026 14:27:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772720859; cv=none; b=oJmZofmamuqH7J+YbI/fnFCTBrwHkZ1djmsqzgKIyD8T7JLGAQamxw65swaTLlp98XiHcJZCgi9kLz5OT7t9nSR4RHGXg3KPzGjrizqbmtsBg0nnbW2QlZAaY2LHNZcGNMO4BMpIoFzvL4XM94ohBSnrz1OX7Guv3N6tkoBcgW4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772720859; c=relaxed/simple; bh=hck/tHHv3z8v+VE/arQv3d0oAiX/ouYvA9f3YKBKOdQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=EVVJPRFTLfBdxFKt7FduJCXIsHIuo5bukYGp4wivzjFlHfhRB/g7By9bXTM96eoxkhi+ag4ND6/8gTOPi8sHqs3NEwotW1tErr23Z7rKVcYMRRlRbAPLpfk+erK+wyJ8NitwyzaDf6gZldiUunmHRtl6Mum9l+hqwB3bJx3kGJs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=SziOaQHg; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="SziOaQHg" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=hck/tHHv3z8v+VE/arQv3d0oAiX/ouYvA9f3YKBKOdQ=; b=SziOaQHg0WC8s6Y3T/QlO2OzaN Buex6G7OVWCDrhOQnqCLM7kr0tgAQIodr0Wc7X6mn3eMI6sLk7hga32etcAuJBQ7DrClJaWBCYB6W gwoMOlxVJdAmLNSnp6///6J2uogqA+8HtBqE53Wsdo85owoJEHmn7QXUGvQIMk+cOMtVtNrZGrZb/ WL95RzGYqS6jR0HFJ7F+CKJFNMyIudU428K8257WNcuC2i/kOSBWu8b+MyCUkTjSRsPTKJOr1Ti8+ uQb3T2996bw3jvSGUA19D0Gf+G6MbE5j65w23SfRoFb/yG9h8LUsRXD+RCdxrmkza2Wym291jnq6T J4Zt7xjw==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vy9fq-00000001zVi-3XNJ; Thu, 05 Mar 2026 14:27:34 +0000 Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2026 06:27:34 -0800 From: "hch@infradead.org" To: Hyunchul Lee Cc: Viacheslav Dubeyko , "hch@infradead.org" , "glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de" , "frank.li@vivo.com" , "slava@dubeyko.com" , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "cheol.lee@lge.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH] hfsplus: limit sb_maxbytes to partition size Message-ID: References: <20260303082807.750679-1-hyc.lee@gmail.com> <5c670210661f30038070616c65492fa2a96b028c.camel@ibm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html On Thu, Mar 05, 2026 at 09:29:33AM +0900, Hyunchul Lee wrote: > Sorry it's generic/285, not generic/268. > in generic/285, there is a test that creates a hole exceeding the block > size and appends small data to the file. hfsplus fails because it fills > the block device and returns ENOSPC. However if it returns EFBIG > instead, the test is skipped. generic/285 needs to call _require_sparse_files.