public inbox for linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] iomap, xfs: lift zero range hole mapping flush into xfs
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2026 10:06:35 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aamb-zfiAd0xYqQP@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aamPDBAAuK8vvYDw@infradead.org>

On Thu, Mar 05, 2026 at 06:11:24AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2026 at 12:04:04PM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> > This patch seems to work on a quick test. It's basically the two patches
> > squashed together (I'd post them as independent patches), so nothing too
> > different, but if we fix up the zero logic first that helps clean up the
> > indentation as a bonus.
> 
> Cool, thanks a lot for putting in this extra effort!
> 
> Cosmetic comment on the comment:
> 
> > +	/*
> > +	 * We don't allocate blocks for zeroing a hole, but we only report a
> > +	 * hole in zoned mode if one exists in both the COW and data forks.
> 
> I'd reword this a bit as:
> 
> 	/*
> 	 * When zeroing, don't allocate blocks for holes as they already
> 	 * zeroes, but we need to ensure that no extents exist in both
> 	 * the data and COW fork to ensure this really is a hole.
> > +	 *
> > +	 * There is currently a corner case where writeback removes the COW fork
> > +	 * mapping and unlocks the inode, leaving a transient state where a hole
> > +	 * exists in both forks until write completion maps blocks into the data
> > +	 * fork. Until we can avoid this transient hole state, detect and avoid
> > +	 * this with a flush of any such range that appears dirty in pagecache.
> > +	 */
> 
> 

Sure. I had reworked the latter part of the comment as well. With both
the changes it currently looks like:

        /*
         * When zeroing, don't allocate blocks for holes as they are already
         * zeroes, but we need to ensure that no extents exist in both the data
         * and COW fork to ensure this really is a hole.
         *
         * A window exists where we might observe a hole in both forks with
         * valid data in cache. Writeback removes the COW fork blocks on
         * submission but doesn't remap into the data fork until completion. If
         * the data fork was previously a hole, we'll fail to zero. Until we
         * find a way to avoid this transient state, check for dirty pagecache
         * and flush to wait on blocks to land in the data fork.
         */

Brian


  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-05 15:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-29 15:50 [PATCH v2 0/5] iomap, xfs: improve zero range flushing and lookup Brian Foster
2026-01-29 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] iomap, xfs: lift zero range hole mapping flush into xfs Brian Foster
2026-02-10 16:15   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-10 19:14     ` Brian Foster
2026-02-11 15:36       ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-13  6:06   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-13 17:37     ` Brian Foster
2026-03-02 19:02       ` Brian Foster
2026-03-03 14:37         ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-03 19:00           ` Brian Foster
2026-03-04 13:13             ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-04 14:17               ` Brian Foster
2026-03-04 14:41                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-04 15:02                   ` Brian Foster
2026-03-04 17:04                     ` Brian Foster
2026-03-05 14:11                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-05 15:06                         ` Brian Foster [this message]
2026-03-05 16:10                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-13 10:20   ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2026-02-13 16:24     ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-02-18 17:41       ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2026-01-29 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] xfs: flush eof folio before insert range size update Brian Foster
2026-02-10 16:16   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-10 19:14     ` Brian Foster
2026-01-29 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] xfs: look up cow fork extent earlier for buffered iomap_begin Brian Foster
2026-02-10 16:17   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-29 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] xfs: only flush when COW fork blocks overlap data fork holes Brian Foster
2026-02-10 16:19   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-10 19:18     ` Brian Foster
2026-02-17 15:06   ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2026-02-18 15:37     ` Brian Foster
2026-02-18 17:40       ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2026-01-29 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] xfs: replace zero range flush with folio batch Brian Foster
2026-02-10 16:21   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-10 19:19     ` Brian Foster
2026-02-11 15:41       ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aamb-zfiAd0xYqQP@bfoster \
    --to=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox