From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] iomap, xfs: lift zero range hole mapping flush into xfs
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2026 10:06:35 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aamb-zfiAd0xYqQP@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aamPDBAAuK8vvYDw@infradead.org>
On Thu, Mar 05, 2026 at 06:11:24AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2026 at 12:04:04PM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> > This patch seems to work on a quick test. It's basically the two patches
> > squashed together (I'd post them as independent patches), so nothing too
> > different, but if we fix up the zero logic first that helps clean up the
> > indentation as a bonus.
>
> Cool, thanks a lot for putting in this extra effort!
>
> Cosmetic comment on the comment:
>
> > + /*
> > + * We don't allocate blocks for zeroing a hole, but we only report a
> > + * hole in zoned mode if one exists in both the COW and data forks.
>
> I'd reword this a bit as:
>
> /*
> * When zeroing, don't allocate blocks for holes as they already
> * zeroes, but we need to ensure that no extents exist in both
> * the data and COW fork to ensure this really is a hole.
> > + *
> > + * There is currently a corner case where writeback removes the COW fork
> > + * mapping and unlocks the inode, leaving a transient state where a hole
> > + * exists in both forks until write completion maps blocks into the data
> > + * fork. Until we can avoid this transient hole state, detect and avoid
> > + * this with a flush of any such range that appears dirty in pagecache.
> > + */
>
>
Sure. I had reworked the latter part of the comment as well. With both
the changes it currently looks like:
/*
* When zeroing, don't allocate blocks for holes as they are already
* zeroes, but we need to ensure that no extents exist in both the data
* and COW fork to ensure this really is a hole.
*
* A window exists where we might observe a hole in both forks with
* valid data in cache. Writeback removes the COW fork blocks on
* submission but doesn't remap into the data fork until completion. If
* the data fork was previously a hole, we'll fail to zero. Until we
* find a way to avoid this transient state, check for dirty pagecache
* and flush to wait on blocks to land in the data fork.
*/
Brian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-05 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-29 15:50 [PATCH v2 0/5] iomap, xfs: improve zero range flushing and lookup Brian Foster
2026-01-29 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] iomap, xfs: lift zero range hole mapping flush into xfs Brian Foster
2026-02-10 16:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-10 19:14 ` Brian Foster
2026-02-11 15:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-13 6:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-13 17:37 ` Brian Foster
2026-03-02 19:02 ` Brian Foster
2026-03-03 14:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-03 19:00 ` Brian Foster
2026-03-04 13:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-04 14:17 ` Brian Foster
2026-03-04 14:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-04 15:02 ` Brian Foster
2026-03-04 17:04 ` Brian Foster
2026-03-05 14:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-05 15:06 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2026-03-05 16:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-13 10:20 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2026-02-13 16:24 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-02-18 17:41 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2026-01-29 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] xfs: flush eof folio before insert range size update Brian Foster
2026-02-10 16:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-10 19:14 ` Brian Foster
2026-01-29 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] xfs: look up cow fork extent earlier for buffered iomap_begin Brian Foster
2026-02-10 16:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-29 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] xfs: only flush when COW fork blocks overlap data fork holes Brian Foster
2026-02-10 16:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-10 19:18 ` Brian Foster
2026-02-17 15:06 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2026-02-18 15:37 ` Brian Foster
2026-02-18 17:40 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2026-01-29 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] xfs: replace zero range flush with folio batch Brian Foster
2026-02-10 16:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-10 19:19 ` Brian Foster
2026-02-11 15:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aamb-zfiAd0xYqQP@bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox