From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from stravinsky.debian.org (stravinsky.debian.org [82.195.75.108]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95A7737E312; Fri, 20 Mar 2026 12:39:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=82.195.75.108 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774010403; cv=none; b=kLyqmaZr36Q2vi3ejAOPRIPM5UuqCVMasnXRBE0FDZFOvvV/DJGnm25rEiJitzbV7CKlSuV54hATJ8Ilcr9jcgenLrisgpX74abjEB1Vvr7kVZbKB4fmeupM1xlSvMM6Z/XKkWBUjLkPMUl/2f/ZGWdHr75IC5bEjvAEHErJKt8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774010403; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ovUo3pQgtlbbD+fTGPV8EJisFQ5aT4XfKwBH2JzRlXo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=HE4jHKrPezmXUXL+2dx6RCwLfPNPbJY9tuV1Xj3o+2WP3BvHHmCVkNapoVK3hRt1pZ5LirUzhoXqOVw/FBTVD7NuIyJ4m7QtqScAGl+eOIDzmrN89wEuwHDeBhjlTfk5reI0AuUi9yQQDiPqkNlW1j2uUs9Aj2GKXc+foqswrBQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=debian.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=debian.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=debian.org header.i=@debian.org header.b=QntPnDxZ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=82.195.75.108 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=debian.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=debian.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=debian.org header.i=@debian.org header.b="QntPnDxZ" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; s=smtpauto.stravinsky; h=X-Debian-User:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=ovUo3pQgtlbbD+fTGPV8EJisFQ5aT4XfKwBH2JzRlXo=; b=QntPnDxZH9Jkq8ETTV6L9lOYgW 41c77KHiFc1ab/gDsSnU8AE6DDeS3kenBeoh/pMYrfg1OsMQZJqDVVmxU6LnqTwJvbMUXbr53puZk JF7aaKZjC9BS2zf61CWuTj66oSPFER3nKT/108w8vIbNDfLcwZvKNMZ/5rghT7fiHrUQWrvJyV8D4 VOEo3K7eP4EBXiiYFoJpEkmlnljJA+gf46Ex0J30dwzYiFsT5sE9dqO5nQ0R3xltR4Old5ZmpdaQD +yVdSVwDoG2dmdQdtwJyN15ET9Jb3CPXI6X3WrsL6djP+pGeTSLkJTMbkgsQjKUBYR/g3QmFDGD1D 6bChJiRQ==; Received: from authenticated user by stravinsky.debian.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1w3Z8i-005DB4-S9; Fri, 20 Mar 2026 12:39:43 +0000 Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2026 05:39:38 -0700 From: Breno Leitao To: Andreas Hindborg Cc: Matthew Wood , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org, jlbec@evilplan.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, gustavold@gmail.com, asantostc@gmail.com, calvin@wbinvd.org, kernel-team@meta.com Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] configfs: enable kernel-space item registration Message-ID: References: <-6hh70JX5nq4ruTMbNQPMoUi6wz8vmM2MQxqB3VNK3Zt97c-oxWOo3y0cQ7_h6BSfcp78fR9GmzxcTQb_WB-XA==@protonmail.internalid> <875xakwwvz.fsf@t14s.mail-host-address-is-not-set> <87qzquuqsx.fsf@t14s.mail-host-address-is-not-set> <877bsjvhqv.fsf@t14s.mail-host-address-is-not-set> <87o6kirb61.fsf@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87o6kirb61.fsf@kernel.org> X-Debian-User: leitao Hello Andreas, On Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 12:29:58PM +0100, Andreas Hindborg wrote: > > Hi Breno, > > Breno Leitao writes: > > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 08:53:12AM +0100, Andreas Hindborg wrote: > >> Breno Leitao writes: > >> > >> > On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 11:58:22AM +0100, Andreas Hindborg wrote: > >> >> Perhaps we should discuss this at a venue where we can get some more > >> >> people together? LPC or LSF maybe? > >> > > >> > Certainly, I agree. I've submitted my subscription to LSFMMBPF with the main > >> > goal to discuss this topic. I wasn't planning to present it this, given it was > >> > a "overkill"?, but I'm happy to do so if that is the right direction. > >> > >> I'd appreciate if we can get some people in a room and force them to > >> think about this. I think it is a good idea if you submit a topic. If we > >> don't get a slot, we can see what we can do in the hallway, and if that > >> does not work out we are forced to make a decision between the 4 of us > >> participating on list. At least nobody can say we did not try to collect > >> input and opinions then. > > > > That is an excellent follow-up and direction, let me submit a topic in there. > > I did not see a topic on list, did you submit? Unfortunately, I haven't submitted a topic and won't be able to attend. My daughter is due around the same time as the conference, and I didn't realize the conflict until recently. :-| > At any rate, I did not receive an invitation for LSF this year, so I > will not be able to meet up in that venue. Perhaps it would be best to continue the discussion on the mailing list?