From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/8] xfs: report cow mappings with dirty pagecache for iomap zero range
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 07:59:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <abAxyZur6jWeC_yv@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260310145215.GN1105363@frogsfrogsfrogs>
On Tue, Mar 10, 2026 at 07:52:15AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2026 at 11:50:08PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 09, 2026 at 10:56:02AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > Hrmm. I wonder if IOMAP_REPORT should grow this new "expose dirty
> > > unwritten cow fork mappings over a data fork hole" behavior too? I
> > > guess the only user of IOMAP_REPORT that might care is swapfile
> > > activation, but that fsyncs the whole file to disk before starting the
> > > iteration so I think it won't matter?
> >
> > swapfile really should not be using IOMAP_REPORT, as IOMAP_REPORT
> > implies just reporting what is there, while swapfile actually uses
> > this as an I/O mapping..
>
> Swapfiles are really a read-write lease on the entire file's layout,
> right? Maybe we ought to just have an IOMAP_LAYOUT opflag for it and
> pnfs?
I thought about that. It's basically like a pnfs layout, except that
it can't ever be recalled.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-10 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-09 13:44 [PATCH v3 0/8] iomap, xfs: improve zero range flushing and lookup Brian Foster
2026-03-09 13:44 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] xfs: fix iomap hole map reporting for zoned zero range Brian Foster
2026-03-09 17:11 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-09 18:18 ` Brian Foster
2026-03-10 14:47 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-10 6:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-09 13:45 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] xfs: flush dirty pagecache over hole in zoned mode " Brian Foster
2026-03-09 17:22 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-09 18:19 ` Brian Foster
2026-03-10 6:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-10 14:48 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-10 6:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-09 13:45 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] iomap, xfs: lift zero range hole mapping flush into xfs Brian Foster
2026-03-09 17:40 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-10 6:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-09 13:45 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] xfs: flush eof folio before insert range size update Brian Foster
2026-03-09 17:32 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-09 18:24 ` Brian Foster
2026-03-09 13:45 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] xfs: look up cow fork extent earlier for buffered iomap_begin Brian Foster
2026-03-09 13:45 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] xfs: only flush when COW fork blocks overlap data fork holes Brian Foster
2026-03-09 17:47 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-09 13:45 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] xfs: replace zero range flush with folio batch Brian Foster
2026-03-09 17:48 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-09 13:45 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] xfs: report cow mappings with dirty pagecache for iomap zero range Brian Foster
2026-03-09 17:56 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-09 18:31 ` Brian Foster
2026-03-09 18:38 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-10 6:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-10 14:52 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-10 14:59 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-03-10 6:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-10 6:45 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] iomap, xfs: improve zero range flushing and lookup Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=abAxyZur6jWeC_yv@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox