Re: [PATCH v2 03/15] userfaultfd: introduce mfill_get_pmd() helper.

["David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>]

On 3/6/26 18:18, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@kernel.org>

Nit: "." at the end of the patch subject

> 
> There is a lengthy code chunk in mfill_atomic() that establishes the PMD
> for UFFDIO operations. This code may be called twice: first time when
> the copy is performed with VMA/mm locks held and the other time after
> the copy is retried with locks dropped.
> 
> Move the code that establishes a PMD into a helper function so it can be
> reused later during refactoring of mfill_atomic_pte_copy().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
> ---
>  mm/userfaultfd.c | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>  1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/userfaultfd.c b/mm/userfaultfd.c
> index e68d01743b03..224b55804f99 100644
> --- a/mm/userfaultfd.c
> +++ b/mm/userfaultfd.c
> @@ -157,6 +157,57 @@ static void uffd_mfill_unlock(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> +static pmd_t *mm_alloc_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address)
> +{
> +	pgd_t *pgd;
> +	p4d_t *p4d;
> +	pud_t *pud;
> +
> +	pgd = pgd_offset(mm, address);
> +	p4d = p4d_alloc(mm, pgd, address);
> +	if (!p4d)
> +		return NULL;
> +	pud = pud_alloc(mm, p4d, address);
> +	if (!pud)
> +		return NULL;
> +	/*
> +	 * Note that we didn't run this because the pmd was
> +	 * missing, the *pmd may be already established and in
> +	 * turn it may also be a trans_huge_pmd.
> +	 */
> +	return pmd_alloc(mm, pud, address);
> +}
> +
> +static int mfill_get_pmd(struct mfill_state *state)
> +{
> +	struct mm_struct *dst_mm = state->ctx->mm;
> +	pmd_t *dst_pmd;
> +	pmd_t dst_pmdval;

I'd just have both on a single line.

> +
> +	dst_pmd = mm_alloc_pmd(dst_mm, state->dst_addr);
> +	if (unlikely(!dst_pmd))
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	dst_pmdval = pmdp_get_lockless(dst_pmd);
> +	if (unlikely(pmd_none(dst_pmdval)) &&
> +	    unlikely(__pte_alloc(dst_mm, dst_pmd)))
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	dst_pmdval = pmdp_get_lockless(dst_pmd);
> +	/*
> +	 * If the dst_pmd is THP don't override it and just be strict.
> +	 * (This includes the case where the PMD used to be THP and
> +	 * changed back to none after __pte_alloc().)
> +	 */
> +	if (unlikely(!pmd_present(dst_pmdval) || pmd_trans_huge(dst_pmdval)))

Can we directly switch to pmd_leaf() while touching that?

> +		return -EEXIST;
> +	if (unlikely(pmd_bad(dst_pmdval)))
> +		return -EFAULT;
> +
> +	state->pmd = dst_pmd;
> +	return 0;
> +}


[...]

>  	/*
>  	 * Sanitize the command parameters:
> @@ -809,41 +838,15 @@ static __always_inline ssize_t mfill_atomic(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx,
>  	while (state.src_addr < src_start + len) {
>  		VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(state.dst_addr >= dst_start + len);
>  
> -		pmd_t dst_pmdval;
> -
> -		dst_pmd = mm_alloc_pmd(dst_mm, state.dst_addr);
> -		if (unlikely(!dst_pmd)) {
> -			err = -ENOMEM;
> +		err = mfill_get_pmd(&state);
> +		if (err)


It's a bit odd that a "get" function doesn't return a PMD pointer but
instead stores it in the state.

Maybe more like "mfill_prepare_pmd" ? But actually you want to have a
pte table.

mfill_prepare_pte_table() or alternatively mfill_alloc_pte_table() /
mfill_alloc_dst_pte_table()

-- 
Cheers,

David