Re: Btrfs trees for linux-next

["Kay Sievers" <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>]

On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 22:03, Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com> wrote:
> On Dec 11, 2008  09:43 -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
>> The multi-device code uses a very simple brute force scan from userland
>> to populate the list of devices that belong to a given FS.  Kay Sievers
>> has some ideas on hotplug magic to make this less dumb.  (The scan isn't
>> required for single device filesystems).
>
> This should use libblkid to do the scanning of the devices, and it can
> cache the results for efficiency.  Best would be to have the same LABEL+UUID
> for all devices in the same filesystem, and then once any of these devices
> are found the mount.btrfs code can query the rest of the devices to find
> the remaining parts of the filesystem.

Which is another way to do something you should not do that way in the
first place, just with a library instead of your own code.

Brute-force scanning /dev with a single thread will not work reliably
in many setups we need to support. Sure, it's good to have it for a
rescue system, it will work fine or your workstation, but definitely
not for boxes with many devices where you don't know how they behave.

Just do:
  $ modprobe scsi_debug max_luns=8 num_parts=2
  $ echo 1 > /sys/module/scsi_debug/parameters/every_nth
  $ echo 4 > /sys/module/scsi_debug/parameters/opts

  $ ls -l /sys/class/block/ | wc -l
  45
and then call any binary doing /dev scanning, and wait (in this case)
for ~2 hours to return.

Also, the blkid cache file uses major/minor numbers or kernel device
names, which will also not help in many setups we have to support
today.

The original btrfs topic, leading to this, is here:
  http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org/msg01048.html

Thanks,
Kay