From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Ravi Singh <ravising@redhat.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
adilger@dilger.ca, jack@suse.com, cem@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: return default quota limits for IDs without a dquot
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 22:46:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <acN20taCrUDjd2v1@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260325001621.GD6202@frogsfrogsfrogs>
On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 05:16:21PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > Without fix: empty output
> > With fix:
> > Disk quotas for User testuser8 (1003)
> > Filesystem Blocks Quota Limit Warn/Time Mounted on
> > /dev/vde 0 10240 20480 00 [--------] /mnt/test
>
> Hmm, yes, that looks like a bug to me.
Agreed.
> > Scenario 2: dquot exists with non-zero counts but zero limits (v2 does NOT fix):
> >
> > A dquot is created for testuser8 before default limits are configured.
> > When the chown runs, xfs_qm_adjust_dqlimits() is called in
> > xfs_trans_apply_dquot_deltas(), but the defaults are all zero at that
> > point so nothing is pushed into the dquot. When the admin later sets
> > limits on ID 0, testuser8's existing dquot is not retroactively updated.
> > xfs_qm_dqget() succeeds and XFS_IS_DQUOT_UNINITIALIZED is
> > false (q_ino.count != 0), so xfs_qm_scall_getquota_fill_qc() returns
> > the dquot's zero limits.
>
> I think this is a difference in opinion -- the last time I checked, the
> default limits are only supposed to be propagated to newly allocated
> ondisk dquots.
Yes.
> I don't think we should create more userspace abi since nobody seems to
> think that anyone uses quota limit reporting aggressively. But if
> anyone does, now would be a good time to say something.
Agreed. The fix one looks sensible, and everything else at this point
feels like a candidate for better documentation of the current
semantics.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-25 5:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-12 9:08 [RFC PATCH] quota: allow unprivileged users to query ID 0 default limits Ravi Singh
2026-03-12 9:45 ` Andreas Dilger
2026-03-17 6:59 ` Ravi Singh
2026-03-17 6:59 ` [PATCH v2] xfs: return default quota limits for IDs without a dquot Ravi Singh
2026-03-17 12:19 ` Jan Kara
2026-03-17 13:31 ` Theodore Tso
2026-03-18 17:29 ` Jan Kara
2026-03-18 22:18 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-19 12:22 ` Jan Kara
2026-03-23 11:25 ` Ravi Singh
2026-03-25 0:16 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-25 5:46 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-03-25 9:11 ` Ravi Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=acN20taCrUDjd2v1@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=adilger@dilger.ca \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ravising@redhat.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox