From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp05-ext.udag.de (smtp05-ext.udag.de [62.146.106.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64725378D8B; Thu, 26 Mar 2026 15:51:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.146.106.75 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774540314; cv=none; b=m9w6qDNm/rB7iSWOnnWbK9NxmLOspTmlnz2vXltaTTM08ANODBW5Zv4OoXu6GBJeJGPFHQbIhhLCH+x6nATq0z92RpMf8NyKsf6Tl0TCQIg5Lng8Ohd3bfTImsp5X+OO/rekpq+TZanfgTKSsGAKipw6KEWIjRoiqhCe2Dvyx0Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774540314; c=relaxed/simple; bh=K95S268P3m3xmd/LN8KS38xzkNrMW8+0DTYA+JTEpSQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=V1R0+8Z5AU0XTbMka7gUytLn55E8flXyjfFMtSNhh05mT2NK5SyUGbSHx7b6D0w7c667hEDTXhfFm4swci6lpjlAdLjFFxT6W3LCaIz6gVm2ZJov28pzKIpFwCa8bIoV627Nwyt4jgyN1BgrN2MZsL+6M6/TDaflIC+fhCiDELc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=birthelmer.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=birthelmer.de; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.146.106.75 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=birthelmer.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=birthelmer.de Received: from localhost (108-141-067-156.ip-addr.inexio.net [156.67.141.108]) by smtp05-ext.udag.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0BF1FE036D; Thu, 26 Mar 2026 16:44:02 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: smtp05-ext.udag.de; auth=pass smtp.auth=birthelmercom-0001 smtp.mailfrom=horst@birthelmer.de Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 16:44:02 +0100 From: Horst Birthelmer To: Cyril Hrubis Cc: kernel test robot , Horst Birthelmer , lkp@intel.com, Miklos Szeredi , Bernd Schubert , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Horst Birthelmer , ltp@lists.linux.it, oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, Joanne Koong Subject: Re: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] fuse: when copying a folio delay the mark dirty until the end Message-ID: References: <20260316-mark-dirty-per-folio-v1-1-8dc39c94b7ce@ddn.com> <202603261451.d2a4cd46-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Thu, Mar 26, 2026 at 04:05:15PM +0100, Cyril Hrubis wrote: > Hi! > > commit: 47f8dde97f35e32a1003d54e387273bcdf014ddf ("[PATCH] fuse: when copying a folio delay the mark dirty until the end") > > url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Horst-Birthelmer/fuse-when-copying-a-folio-delay-the-mark-dirty-until-the-end/20260316-234418 > > patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260316-mark-dirty-per-folio-v1-1-8dc39c94b7ce@ddn.com/ > > patch subject: [PATCH] fuse: when copying a folio delay the mark dirty until the end > > > > in testcase: ltp > > version: > > with following parameters: > > > > disk: 1HDD > > fs: ext4 > > test: fs-03 > > Looks like the test that has failed was fs_fill that runs several > threads that attempt to fill the filesystem (until they get ENOSCP) then > delete the files and try again. And apparently we managed to get EIO > when file has been closed() by one of the threads after a few minutes of > the runtime on NTFS mounted over FUSE. > Probably nothing to do with the patch itself, but the patch will never make it since it contains a wrong assumption. Thanks for clarifying! > -- > Cyril Hrubis > chrubis@suse.cz Horst