Re: [PATCH V10 00/10] famfs: port into fuse

[Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>]

On Thu, Apr 16, 2026 at 06:24:02PM -0700, Joanne Koong wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2026 at 1:14 PM Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net> wrote:
> >
> > I worry that this discussion is going to turn towards implementing a
> > solution grounded in parsing arbitrary formats and how to store them,
> > and that is completely detached from why FAMFS went this route in the
> > first place.
> >
> > I question whether the actual issue here lies in the interface APPEARING
> > more general purpose than it actually is - and therefore inviting
> > attempts to over-genericize it.
> 
> Would you mind clarifying this part? Are you saying that the interface
> and logic is *already* generic and usable for other dax-backed
> servers, just that everything is *named* famfs but it's not really
> famfs specific? 

Yes.

If you just find/replace "famfs" with "dax_iomap", the structures
here don't really seem all *that* crazy specific - they're just
optimized for memory speeds instead of I/O.

There is a circular nature to this - FAMFS figured it out first, in
what we think is a reasonably generic way, but we can't know for sure.

John, Dan, and Darrick have all proposed reasonable ways to hedge
against the obvious fact the interface will not be perfect - which
incorporates your BPF proposal along with a reasonably straight forward
deprecation path that's not always possible in other arenas.

All that while solving a real (and novel) problem.

That's actually pretty damn cool.

I would urge you to consider these proposals earnestly.

~Gregory