From: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
wangzijie <wangzijie1@honor.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Wei Yang <albinwyang@tencent.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: use strnlen() for name validation in __proc_create
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 16:17:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aeeG4vcIZpxCwlB3@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40e8e922-7962-4ab2-a0ee-8475701b1110@p183>
On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 04:02:24PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 02:26:47PM +0200, Thorsten Blum wrote:
> > Replace strlen(fn) with strnlen(fn, NAME_MAX + 1) when validating the
> > final path component in __proc_create().
> >
> > This preserves the existing name limit while bounding the length scan to
> > one byte past the maximum name length. Handle empty names separately,
> > and treat names longer than NAME_MAX as too long.
>
> 256 in the code is really U8_MAX+1 (see proc_dir_entry.namelen).
>
> The fact that NAME_MAX is also 255 is a coincidence. I didn't thought
> about NAME_MAX when writing this code.
>
> Can you just change 256 to NAME_MAX?
I assume you meant U8_MAX here ^^
I don't mind switching to U8_MAX, but NAME_MAX seems semantically better
since we're validating a filename.
Thanks,
Thorsten
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-21 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-21 12:26 [PATCH] proc: use strnlen() for name validation in __proc_create Thorsten Blum
2026-04-21 12:39 ` Jan Kara
2026-04-21 13:02 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2026-04-21 14:17 ` Thorsten Blum [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aeeG4vcIZpxCwlB3@linux.dev \
--to=thorsten.blum@linux.dev \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=albinwyang@tencent.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=wangzijie1@honor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox