From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Fengnan Chang <fengnanchang@gmail.com>
Cc: brauner@kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org, hch@infradead.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, lidiangang@bytedance.com,
Fengnan Chang <changfengnan@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iomap: avoid memset iomap when iter is done
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2026 06:59:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aeiqJDF1S3nlme72@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260420061630.62077-1-changfengnan@bytedance.com>
On Mon, Apr 20, 2026 at 02:16:30PM +0800, Fengnan Chang wrote:
> When iomap_iter() finishes its iteration (returns <= 0), it is no longer
> necessary to memset the entire iomap and srcmap structures.
>
> In high-IOPS scenarios (like 4k randread NVMe polling with io_uring),
> where the majority of I/Os complete in a single extent map, this wasted
> memory write bandwidth, as the caller will just discard the iterator.
> Use this command to test:
> taskset -c 30 ./t/io_uring -p1 -d512 -b4096 -s32 -c32 -F1 -B1 -R1 -X1
> -n1 -P1 /mnt/testfile
> IOPS improve about 5% on ext4 and XFS.
>
> However, we MUST still call iomap_iter_reset_iomap() to release the
> folio_batch if IOMAP_F_FOLIO_BATCH is set, otherwise we leak page
> references. Therefore, split the cleanup logic: always release the
> folio_batch, but skip the memset() when ret <= 0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fengnan Chang <changfengnan@bytedance.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> fs/iomap/iter.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/iomap/iter.c b/fs/iomap/iter.c
> index c04796f6e57f..e4a29829591a 100644
> --- a/fs/iomap/iter.c
> +++ b/fs/iomap/iter.c
> @@ -6,17 +6,13 @@
> #include <linux/iomap.h>
> #include "trace.h"
>
> -static inline void iomap_iter_reset_iomap(struct iomap_iter *iter)
> +static inline void iomap_iter_clean_fbatch(struct iomap_iter *iter)
> {
> if (iter->iomap.flags & IOMAP_F_FOLIO_BATCH) {
> folio_batch_release(iter->fbatch);
> folio_batch_reinit(iter->fbatch);
> iter->iomap.flags &= ~IOMAP_F_FOLIO_BATCH;
> }
> -
> - iter->status = 0;
> - memset(&iter->iomap, 0, sizeof(iter->iomap));
> - memset(&iter->srcmap, 0, sizeof(iter->srcmap));
> }
>
> /* Advance the current iterator position and decrement the remaining length */
> @@ -102,10 +98,14 @@ int iomap_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, const struct iomap_ops *ops)
> ret = 0;
> else
> ret = 1;
> - iomap_iter_reset_iomap(iter);
> + iomap_iter_clean_fbatch(iter);
> + iter->status = 0;
> if (ret <= 0)
> return ret;
>
> + memset(&iter->iomap, 0, sizeof(iter->iomap));
> + memset(&iter->srcmap, 0, sizeof(iter->srcmap));
> +
> begin:
> ret = ops->iomap_begin(iter->inode, iter->pos, iter->len, iter->flags,
> &iter->iomap, &iter->srcmap);
> --
> 2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-22 10:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-20 6:16 [PATCH v2] iomap: avoid memset iomap when iter is done Fengnan Chang
2026-04-22 6:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-22 10:59 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2026-04-22 12:56 ` Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aeiqJDF1S3nlme72@bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=changfengnan@bytedance.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fengnanchang@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=lidiangang@bytedance.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox