From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: Kernel/Glibc: EOPNOTSUPP vs. ENOTSUP vs. ENOTSUPP (also [RFC] POSIX ACL kernel infrastructure) Date: 4 Aug 2002 11:32:12 -0700 Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: References: <200208041546.47041.agruen@suse.de> <20020804154628.A28845@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Return-path: Received: (from root@localhost) by neon-gw.transmeta.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA02787 for ; Sun, 4 Aug 2002 11:32:37 -0700 Received: from palladium.transmeta.com (palladium.transmeta.com [10.1.1.46]) by deepthought.transmeta.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g74IWDj23304 for ; Sun, 4 Aug 2002 11:32:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from mail@localhost) by palladium.transmeta.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA07033 for linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; Sun, 4 Aug 2002 11:32:13 -0700 To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Followup to: <20020804154628.A28845@infradead.org> By author: Christoph Hellwig In newsgroup: linux.dev.fs.devel > > On Sun, Aug 04, 2002 at 03:46:47PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > > The standard further says the numbers assigned to ENOTSUP and EOPNOTSUPP > > shall be unique. > > Where? I can't find it in my copy of 1003.1eD17 > In the final version of 1003.1:2001, it is at the Base definitions volume, page 217, line 7687: 7686 The header shall provide a declaration for errno and give positive values for the 7687 following symbolic constants. Their values shall be unique except as noted below. [ENOTSUP] and [EOPNOTSUPP] are both listed without allowing the numbers to be aliased. -hpa -- at work, in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt