From: Richard Cheng <icheng@nvidia.com>
To: John Groves <john@jagalactic.com>
Cc: John Groves <John@groves.net>, Dan Williams <djbw@kernel.org>,
John Groves <jgroves@micron.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
Ira Weiny <iweiny@kernel.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
"nvdimm@lists.linux.dev" <nvdimm@lists.linux.dev>,
"linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org" <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 02/10] dax/fsdev: fix multi-range offset in memory_failure handler
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 14:55:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ajotQmNtiDm2c9Ap@MWDK4CY14F> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0100019ecc08d74f-ec0d09b8-11e9-4e5b-af48-8c6d382af486-000000@email.amazonses.com>
On Mon, Jun 15, 2026 at 04:06:32PM +0800, John Groves wrote:
> From: John Groves <John@Groves.net>
>
> Fix memory_failure offset calculation for multi-range devices. The old
> code subtracted ranges[0].range.start from the faulting PFN's physical
> address, which produces an incorrect (inflated) logical offset when the
> PFN falls in ranges[1] or beyond due to physical gaps between ranges.
> Add fsdev_pfn_to_offset() to walk the range list and compute the correct
> device-linear byte offset relative to ranges[0].start (the device data
> start) -- the base the holder (xfs, famfs) maps from -- for both static
> and dynamic devices.
>
> V5 walked the pagemap's immutable pgmap->ranges[] instead, to avoid
> reading the mutable dev_dax->ranges[] from this callback. That had a
> different problem: it regressed static devices, where pgmap->ranges[0].start
> can sit data_offset below the data start, so the reported offset came out
> data_offset too high and the holder would act on the wrong blocks. For
> dynamic devices the two arrays are identical, so pgmap->ranges[] only ever
> helped the dynamic case while breaking the static one. Walk
> dev_dax->ranges[] instead. (Richard Cheng spotted the static regression.)
>
> Reading dev_dax->ranges[] here may race a concurrent krealloc() of the
> range array via sysfs (mapping_store(), under dax_region_rwsem, which
> this ->memory_failure callback does not hold). That exposure is
> pre-existing -- the original single-range code read dev_dax->ranges[0]
> locklessly as well -- so this patch does not make it worse; a proper fix
> (locking or snapshotting) belongs in a separate change.
>
Hi John,
LGTM, thanks for your work !
Reviewed-by: Richard Cheng <icheng@nvidia.com>
Best regards,
Richard Cheng.
> Fixes: d5406bd458b0a ("dax: add fsdev.c driver for fs-dax on character dax")
>
> Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: John Groves <john@groves.net>
> ---
> drivers/dax/fsdev.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dax/fsdev.c b/drivers/dax/fsdev.c
> index 188b2526bee45..f315533b299e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/dax/fsdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/dax/fsdev.c
> @@ -135,11 +135,26 @@ static void fsdev_clear_ops(void *data)
> * The core mm code in free_zone_device_folio() handles the wake_up_var()
> * directly for this memory type.
> */
> +static u64 fsdev_pfn_to_offset(struct dev_dax *dev_dax, unsigned long pfn)
> +{
> + phys_addr_t phys = PFN_PHYS(pfn);
> + u64 offset = 0;
> +
> + for (int i = 0; i < dev_dax->nr_range; i++) {
> + struct range *range = &dev_dax->ranges[i].range;
> +
> + if (phys >= range->start && phys <= range->end)
> + return offset + (phys - range->start);
> + offset += range_len(range);
> + }
> + return -1ULL;
> +}
> +
> static int fsdev_pagemap_memory_failure(struct dev_pagemap *pgmap,
> unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages, int mf_flags)
> {
> struct dev_dax *dev_dax = pgmap->owner;
> - u64 offset = PFN_PHYS(pfn) - dev_dax->ranges[0].range.start;
> + u64 offset = fsdev_pfn_to_offset(dev_dax, pfn);
> u64 len = nr_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
>
> return dax_holder_notify_failure(dev_dax->dax_dev, offset,
> --
> 2.53.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-23 6:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260615160531.17432-1-john@jagalactic.com>
2026-06-15 16:05 ` [PATCH V6 0/10] Fixes to the previously-merged drivers/dax/fsdev series John Groves
2026-06-15 16:06 ` [PATCH V6 01/10] dax: fix misleading comment about share/index union in dax_folio_reset_order() John Groves
2026-06-15 16:06 ` [PATCH V6 02/10] dax/fsdev: fix multi-range offset in memory_failure handler John Groves
2026-06-23 6:55 ` Richard Cheng [this message]
2026-06-15 16:06 ` [PATCH V6 03/10] dax/fsdev: clear vmemmap_shift when binding static pgmap John Groves
2026-06-15 16:06 ` [PATCH V6 04/10] dax/fsdev: don't leave a dangling dev_dax->pgmap on probe failure John Groves
2026-06-15 16:07 ` [PATCH V6 05/10] dax/fsdev: clear pgmap ops and owner on unbind John Groves
2026-06-22 10:31 ` Richard Cheng
2026-06-15 16:07 ` [PATCH V6 06/10] dax/fsdev: use __va(phys) for kaddr in direct_access John Groves
2026-06-15 16:07 ` [PATCH V6 07/10] dax/fsdev: fail probe on invalid pgmap offset John Groves
2026-06-15 16:07 ` [PATCH V6 08/10] dax: read holder_ops once in dax_holder_notify_failure() John Groves
2026-06-15 16:07 ` [PATCH V6 09/10] dax: fix holder_ops race in fs_put_dax() John Groves
2026-06-15 16:07 ` [PATCH V6 10/10] dax: fsdev.c minor formatting cleanup John Groves
2026-07-15 0:06 ` [PATCH V6 0/10] Fixes to the previously-merged drivers/dax/fsdev series Alison Schofield
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ajotQmNtiDm2c9Ap@MWDK4CY14F \
--to=icheng@nvidia.com \
--cc=John@groves.net \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=djbw@kernel.org \
--cc=iweiny@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jgroves@micron.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=john@jagalactic.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox