linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>,
	"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1
Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 11:27:21 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0805071125090.3024@woody.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080507181714.GA14980@elte.hu>



On Wed, 7 May 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> [ this patch should in fact be a bit worse, because there's two more 
>   atomics in the fastpath - the fastpath atomics of the old semaphore 
>   code. ]

Well, it doesn't have the irq stuff, which is also pretty costly. Also, it 
doesn't nest the accesses the same way (with the counts being *inside* the 
spinlock and serialized against each other), so I'm not 100% sure you'd 
get the same behaviour.

But yes, it certainly has the potential to show the same slowdown. But 
it's not a very good patch, since not showing it doesn't really prove 
much.

			Linus

  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-07 18:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1210052904.3453.30.camel@ymzhang>
     [not found] ` <20080506114449.GC32591@elte.hu>
2008-05-06 12:09   ` AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1 Matthew Wilcox
2008-05-06 16:23     ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-05-06 16:36       ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-06 16:42         ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-05-06 16:39           ` Alan Cox
2008-05-06 16:51             ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-05-06 16:45               ` Alan Cox
2008-05-06 17:42               ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-06 20:28           ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-06 16:44         ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-05-06 17:21       ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-06 17:31         ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-05-06 17:49           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-06 18:07             ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-11 11:11               ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-05-06 17:39         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-07  6:49           ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-05-06 17:45         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-07 16:38         ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-05-07 16:55           ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-07 17:08             ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-07 17:16               ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-07 17:27                 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-07 17:22               ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-07 17:25                 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-07 17:31                 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-07 17:47                   ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-07 17:49                   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-07 18:02                     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-07 18:17                       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-07 18:27                         ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2008-05-07 18:43                           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-07 19:01                             ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-07 19:09                               ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-07 19:24                               ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-05-07 19:44                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-07 20:00                                   ` Oi. NFS people. Read this Matthew Wilcox
2008-05-07 22:10                                     ` Trond Myklebust
2008-05-09  1:43                                       ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-05-08  3:24       ` AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1 Zhang, Yanmin
2008-05-08  3:34         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-08  4:37           ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-05-08 14:58             ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.1.10.0805071125090.3024@woody.linux-foundation.org \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bfields@citi.umich.edu \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).