linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: jens.axboe@oracle.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch v3] splice: fix race with page invalidation
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:13:48 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0807301310130.3334@nehalem.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1KOHvq-0001oX-OW@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>



On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> 
> Take this patch as a bugfix.  It's not in any way showing the way
> forward: as soon as you have the time, you can revert it and start
> from the current state.
> 
> Hmm?

I dislike that mentality.

The fact is, it's not a bug-fix, it's just papering over the real problem.

And by papering it over, it then just makes people less likely to bother 
with the real issue.

For example, and I talked about this earlier - what make syou think that 
the FUSE/NFSD behaviour you don't like is at all valid in the first place?

If you depend on data not being truncated because you have it "in flight", 
tjhere's already something wrong there. It's _not_ just that people can 
see zero bytes in the reply - apparently they can see the file shrink 
before they see the read return. That kind of thing just worries me. And 
it might be a general NFS issue, not necessarily a FUSE one.

So I think your whole approach stinks. I don't agree with the "bug-fix". 
It really smells like a "bug-paper-over".

			Linus

  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-30 20:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-30  9:43 [patch v3] splice: fix race with page invalidation Miklos Szeredi
2008-07-30 17:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-30 17:29   ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-07-30 17:54     ` Jens Axboe
2008-07-30 18:32       ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-07-30 18:43         ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-07-30 19:45           ` Jens Axboe
2008-07-30 20:05             ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-07-30 20:13               ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2008-07-30 20:45                 ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-07-30 20:51                   ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-30 21:16                     ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-07-30 21:22                       ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-30 21:46                         ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-07-30 21:56                           ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-31  0:11                   ` Jamie Lokier
2008-07-31  0:42                     ` Jamie Lokier
2008-07-31  0:51                       ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-31  0:54                         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-31  6:12                         ` Jamie Lokier
2008-07-31 10:26                           ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-31 12:33                             ` Jamie Lokier
2008-07-31 12:49                               ` Nick Piggin
2008-07-31 13:29                               ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-31 16:56                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-31 16:34                           ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-31 17:21                             ` Jamie Lokier
2008-07-31 18:54                               ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-31  7:30                     ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-07-31  2:16       ` Nick Piggin
2008-07-31 12:59 ` Nick Piggin
2008-07-31 17:00   ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-31 18:13     ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-08-01  1:22       ` Nick Piggin
2008-08-01 18:28         ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-08-01 18:32           ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-02  4:26           ` Nick Piggin
2008-08-04 15:29             ` Jamie Lokier
2008-08-05  2:57               ` Nick Piggin
2008-08-11  3:22                 ` Michael Kerrisk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.1.10.0807301310130.3334@nehalem.linux-foundation.org \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).