From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Jan Harkes <jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] readdir mess
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 10:20:52 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0808241017580.3363@nehalem.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080824101014.GN28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
On Sun, 24 Aug 2008, Al Viro wrote:
>
> One obvious note: that'll break old_readdir() on coda. There you need to
> change the existing check (you need to check buf.result, then ignore error
> unless buf.result ended up 0).
Hmm? old_readdir() was the only one that I didn't change, because it
didn't need changing. It already ignores the return value of
"vfs_readdir()" entirely if it is positive or zero, and takes it from
buf.result.
So old_readdir() literally doesn't care at all (and never has) whether a
->readdir() function returns zero or a positive number. So changing coda
readdir() it to return zero _instead_ of a positive number makes
absolutely zero difference: old_readdir() will do the same thing
regardless.
What am I missing?
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-24 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-12 6:22 [RFC] readdir mess Al Viro
2008-08-12 17:02 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2008-08-12 17:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-12 18:10 ` Al Viro
2008-08-12 18:22 ` Al Viro
2008-08-12 18:37 ` Al Viro
2008-08-12 19:24 ` Al Viro
2008-08-12 20:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-12 20:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-12 20:38 ` Al Viro
2008-08-12 21:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-13 0:04 ` Al Viro
2008-08-13 0:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-13 1:19 ` Al Viro
2008-08-13 1:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-13 8:36 ` Brad Boyer
2008-08-13 16:19 ` Al Viro
2008-08-15 5:06 ` Jan Harkes
2008-08-15 5:34 ` Al Viro
2008-08-15 16:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-24 10:10 ` Al Viro
2008-08-24 11:03 ` Al Viro
2008-08-25 16:16 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-08-24 17:20 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2008-08-24 19:59 ` Al Viro
2008-08-24 23:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-25 1:33 ` Al Viro
2008-08-25 1:44 ` Al Viro
2008-08-12 19:45 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2008-08-12 20:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-12 20:59 ` Al Viro
2008-08-12 21:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-12 21:54 ` Al Viro
2008-08-12 22:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-13 16:20 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-08-12 21:47 ` Alan Cox
2008-08-12 22:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-12 22:10 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.1.10.0808241017580.3363@nehalem.linux-foundation.org \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).