From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [rfc][patch] store-free path walking
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 12:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0910071222230.3432@localhost.localdomain>
References: <20091006064919.GB30316@wotan.suse.de> <20091006101414.GM5216@kernel.dk> <20091006122623.GE30316@wotan.suse.de> <20091006124941.GS5216@kernel.dk> <20091007085849.GN30316@wotan.suse.de> <alpine.LFD.2.01.0910070742260.3432@localhost.localdomain>
 <alpine.LFD.2.01.0910070911080.3432@localhost.localdomain> <20091007164622.GX30316@wotan.suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner+glk-linux-kernel-3=40m.gmane.org-S1759894AbZJGT0h@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20091007164622.GX30316@wotan.suse.de>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org



On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Nick Piggin wrote:
> 
> Oh I did that, used a "seqcount" which is the bare sequence counter
> (and update it while holding d_lock).

Oh, I didn't notice, for a really silly reason: I looked at how you had 
changed DNAME_INLINE_LEN_MIN on 64-bit, and noticed that you were using 8 
bytes for your sequence lock.

But that's only true due to the padding things, and the seqcount itself is 
indeed just 4 bytes. 

Sad. But we do have the added requirement that we want to keep the 
commonly used fields together in the same cacheline, so maybe it's 
unavoidable.

		Linus