From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Bruno Prémont" <bonbons@linux-vserver.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
"Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@gmail.com>,
"KOSAKI Motohiro" <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>,
"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.39-rc4+: Kernel leaking memory during FS scanning, regression?
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:28:37 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1104262314110.3323@ionos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikjuqWP+PAsObJH4EAOyzgr2RbYNA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 2282 bytes --]
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Bruno Prémont
> <bonbons@linux-vserver.org> wrote:
> >
> > Just in case, /proc/$(pidof rcu_kthread)/status shows ~20k voluntary
> > context switches and exactly one non-voluntary one.
> >
> > In addition when rcu_kthread has stopped doing its work
> > `swapoff $(swapdevice)` seems to block forever (at least normal shutdown
> > blocks on disabling swap device).
> > If I get to do it when I get back home I will manually try to swapoff
> > and take process traces with sysrq-t.
>
> That "exactly one non-voluntary one" sounds like the smoking gun.
>
> Normally SCHED_FIFO runs until it voluntarily gives up the CPU. That's
> kind of the point of SCHED_FIFO. Involuntary context switches happen
> when some higher-priority SCHED_FIFO process becomes runnable (irq
> handlers? You _do_ have CONFIG_IRQ_FORCED_THREADING=y in your config
> too), and maybe there is a bug in the runqueue handling for that case.
The forced irq threading is only effective when you add the command
line parameter "threadirqs". I don't see any irq threads in the ps
outputs, so that's not the problem.
Though the whole ps output is weird. There is only one thread/process
which accumulated CPU time
collectd 1605 0.6 0.7 49924 3748 ? SNLsl 22:14 0:14
All others show 0:00 CPU time - not only kthread_rcu.
Bruno, are you running on real hardware or in a virtual machine?
Can you please enable CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG and provide the output of
/proc/sched_stat when the problem surfaces and a minute after the
first snapshot?
Also please apply the patch below and check, whether the printk shows
up in your dmesg.
Thanks,
tglx
---
kernel/sched_rt.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Index: linux-2.6-tip/kernel/sched_rt.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-tip.orig/kernel/sched_rt.c
+++ linux-2.6-tip/kernel/sched_rt.c
@@ -609,6 +609,7 @@ static int sched_rt_runtime_exceeded(str
if (rt_rq->rt_time > runtime) {
rt_rq->rt_throttled = 1;
+ printk_once(KERN_WARNING "sched: RT throttling activated\n");
if (rt_rq_throttled(rt_rq)) {
sched_rt_rq_dequeue(rt_rq);
return 1;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-26 22:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-24 18:21 2.6.39-rc4+: Kernel leaking memory during FS scanning, regression? Bruno Prémont
2011-04-24 21:59 ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-25 2:42 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-04-25 7:47 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-04-25 9:17 ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-25 9:25 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-04-25 10:34 ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-25 11:41 ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-25 11:47 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-04-25 12:11 ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-25 12:14 ` Tetsuo Handa
2011-04-25 12:21 ` Tetsuo Handa
2011-04-25 15:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-25 16:04 ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-25 16:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-25 17:00 ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-25 17:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-25 17:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-25 18:36 ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-25 19:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-25 21:10 ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-25 21:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-25 21:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-25 21:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-26 6:19 ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-26 11:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-26 16:38 ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-26 17:09 ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-26 17:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-26 22:28 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2011-04-27 6:15 ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-27 18:41 ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-27 19:16 ` Pádraig Brady
2011-04-27 19:34 ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-27 22:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-27 20:40 ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-27 22:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-28 6:10 ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-27 22:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-27 22:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-27 22:32 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-27 22:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-27 23:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-27 23:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-28 9:09 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-28 9:17 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-28 9:40 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-28 10:12 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-04-28 9:45 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-28 10:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-28 13:30 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-04-28 15:28 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-28 15:44 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-28 15:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-28 18:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-28 20:23 ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-28 20:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-28 20:44 ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-28 21:04 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-28 21:51 ` john stultz
2011-04-28 22:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-28 23:06 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-28 23:35 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-29 0:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-29 9:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-29 7:55 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-29 18:09 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-04-29 18:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-29 19:31 ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-29 20:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-29 20:14 ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-30 9:14 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-28 20:41 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-28 19:22 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-04-27 21:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-28 6:22 ` Bruno Prémont
2011-04-28 10:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-26 17:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-26 18:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-26 19:17 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-27 22:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-25 22:08 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-04-25 17:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-25 18:13 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-25 18:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-25 17:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-04-27 10:28 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-04-25 17:51 ` Pekka Enberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.02.1104262314110.3323@ionos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=bonbons@linux-vserver.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paul.mckenney@linaro.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vapier.adi@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).