From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keith Busch Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5 v2] nvme: LightNVM support Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 15:52:12 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <1429101284-19490-1-git-send-email-m@bjorling.me> <1429101284-19490-6-git-send-email-m@bjorling.me> <694D3575-E49B-45BB-8E48-7188169B75F0@paletta.io> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="8323328-1305779471-1429199532=:32385" Cc: Keith Busch , =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Matias_Bj=F8rling?= , hch@infradead.org, axboe@fb.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Javier_Gonz=E1lez?= Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:43844 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752176AbbDPPwN (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:52:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: <694D3575-E49B-45BB-8E48-7188169B75F0@paletta.io> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323328-1305779471-1429199532=:32385 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Thu, 16 Apr 2015, Javier González wrote: >> On 16 Apr 2015, at 16:55, Keith Busch wrote: >> >> Otherwise it looks pretty good to me, but I think it would be cleaner if >> the lightnvm stuff is not mixed in the same file with the standard nvme >> command set. We might end up splitting nvme-core in the future anyway >> for command sets and transports. > > Would you be ok with having nvme-lightnvm for LightNVM specific > commands? Sounds good to me, but I don't really have a dog in this fight. :) --8323328-1305779471-1429199532=:32385--