linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Narron <comet.berkeley@gmail.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [git pull] first batch of ufs fixes
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 14:56:23 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.21.1706131447230.2242@joy.test> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170613014302.GC31671@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>

On Tue, 13 Jun 2017, Al Viro wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 05:54:06PM -0700, Richard Narron wrote:
>
>> Earlier today I could not reproduce the OpenBSD 6.1 ufs1 fsck error after
>> Linux 4.12-rc5 copy of my >2GB file using "cp".
>>
>> But later today I get the error when I copy using your "dd" method...
>>
>> In any case I always get a ufs1 fsck error after the Linux rm and rmdir.
>
> Interesting...  Could you put together an image (starting with zeroing the
> device before newfs, and ideally with dd from /dev/zero to create files)
> that would
> 	a) pass fsck on OpenBSD
> 	b) after rm on Linux fail the same
> then convert it to qcow2 and publish?  Or just compress it - all free and
> data blocks would contain only zeroes, so any kind of compression (gzip,
> bzip2, whatever) would reduce the size to something more managable...

I created a gzip and sent you an email with the link to a UFS1 OpenBSD 
filesytem image.

I finished simple testing of UFS1 with FreeBSD and NetBSD and found no 
problems except for the differences between "available" blocks in df 
commands.

And testing UFS2 was fine with all 3 systems, FreeBSD, OpenBSD and 
NetBSD.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-13 21:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-09 21:38 [git pull] first batch of ufs fixes Al Viro
2017-06-10 13:03 ` Richard Narron
2017-06-10 16:07   ` Al Viro
2017-06-10 18:08     ` Al Viro
2017-06-10 18:12       ` Linus Torvalds
2017-06-11 19:47       ` Richard Narron
2017-06-11 21:30         ` Al Viro
2017-06-12  6:14         ` Al Viro
2017-06-13  0:54           ` Richard Narron
2017-06-13  1:43             ` Al Viro
2017-06-13 21:56               ` Richard Narron [this message]
2017-06-14  7:11                 ` Al Viro
2017-06-14 20:33                   ` Richard Narron
2017-06-15  8:00                   ` Al Viro
2017-06-16 14:29                     ` Richard Narron
2017-06-17  2:15                       ` Al Viro
2017-06-18  1:09                         ` Al Viro
2017-06-18 20:45                           ` Richard Narron
2017-06-20  5:17                           ` [git pull] " Al Viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LNX.2.21.1706131447230.2242@joy.test \
    --to=comet.berkeley@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).