From: Richard Narron <comet.berkeley@gmail.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [git pull] first batch of ufs fixes
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 14:56:23 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.21.1706131447230.2242@joy.test> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170613014302.GC31671@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
On Tue, 13 Jun 2017, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 05:54:06PM -0700, Richard Narron wrote:
>
>> Earlier today I could not reproduce the OpenBSD 6.1 ufs1 fsck error after
>> Linux 4.12-rc5 copy of my >2GB file using "cp".
>>
>> But later today I get the error when I copy using your "dd" method...
>>
>> In any case I always get a ufs1 fsck error after the Linux rm and rmdir.
>
> Interesting... Could you put together an image (starting with zeroing the
> device before newfs, and ideally with dd from /dev/zero to create files)
> that would
> a) pass fsck on OpenBSD
> b) after rm on Linux fail the same
> then convert it to qcow2 and publish? Or just compress it - all free and
> data blocks would contain only zeroes, so any kind of compression (gzip,
> bzip2, whatever) would reduce the size to something more managable...
I created a gzip and sent you an email with the link to a UFS1 OpenBSD
filesytem image.
I finished simple testing of UFS1 with FreeBSD and NetBSD and found no
problems except for the differences between "available" blocks in df
commands.
And testing UFS2 was fine with all 3 systems, FreeBSD, OpenBSD and
NetBSD.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-13 21:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-09 21:38 [git pull] first batch of ufs fixes Al Viro
2017-06-10 13:03 ` Richard Narron
2017-06-10 16:07 ` Al Viro
2017-06-10 18:08 ` Al Viro
2017-06-10 18:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-06-11 19:47 ` Richard Narron
2017-06-11 21:30 ` Al Viro
2017-06-12 6:14 ` Al Viro
2017-06-13 0:54 ` Richard Narron
2017-06-13 1:43 ` Al Viro
2017-06-13 21:56 ` Richard Narron [this message]
2017-06-14 7:11 ` Al Viro
2017-06-14 20:33 ` Richard Narron
2017-06-15 8:00 ` Al Viro
2017-06-16 14:29 ` Richard Narron
2017-06-17 2:15 ` Al Viro
2017-06-18 1:09 ` Al Viro
2017-06-18 20:45 ` Richard Narron
2017-06-20 5:17 ` [git pull] " Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LNX.2.21.1706131447230.2242@joy.test \
--to=comet.berkeley@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).