From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Morris Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: Fix possible NULL pointer dereference in inode_permission() Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 13:36:59 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: References: <20140109162731.12500986@gandalf.local.home> <20140109214239.GD29910@parisc-linux.org> <20140109165012.391db81e@gandalf.local.home> <20140109223127.GM10323@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20140109182523.5b50131f@gandalf.local.home> <20140109182756.17abaaa8@gandalf.local.home> <1389310626.15209.92.camel@localhost> <20140110000642.GN10323@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Al Viro , Eric Paris , Steven Rostedt , Paul McKenney , Dave Chinner , linux-fsdevel , James Morris , Andrew Morton , Stephen Smalley , "Theodore Ts'o" , stable , Paul Moore , LKML , Matthew Wilcox , Christoph Hellwig To: Linus Torvalds Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 10 Jan 2014, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > There's an extra source of headache, BTW - what about the "LSM stacking" > > crowd and their plans? > > LSM stacking is a pipedream right now anyway, isn't it? It's been > talked about for years and years, I've never seen a patch-set that is > even remotely something we'd seriously consider. > And there's no good justification for it. -- James Morris