linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 19/22] ext4: Add XIP functionality
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 16:12:11 -0700 (MST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.00.1402111536290.55274@scrumpy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CF1FF3EB.24114%matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com>

On Wed, 15 Jan 2014, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> From: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
> 
> This is a port of the XIP functionality found in the current version of
> ext2.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
> [heavily tweaked]
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com>

...

> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index c767666..8b73d77 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -663,6 +663,18 @@ found:
>  			WARN_ON(1);
>  		}
>  
> +		/* this is probably wrong for ext4.  unlike ext2, ext4 supports
> +		 * uninitialised extents, so we should probably be hooking
> +		 * into the "make it initialised" code instead. */
> +		if (IS_XIP(inode)) {

With the very first version of this patch the above logic seemed to work
correctly, zeroing blocks as we allocated them.  With the current XIP
infrastructure based tightly on direct IO this ends up being wrong because in
some cases we can call ext4_map_blocks() twice for a given block.  

A quick userland test program that creates a new file, truncates it up to 4k
and then does a partial block write will end up giving you a file filled with
all zeros.  This is because we zero the data before the write, do the write,
and then zero again, overwriting the data.  The second call to
ext4_map_blocks() happens via ext4_ext_direct_IO =>
ext4_convert_unwritten_extents() => ext4_map_blocks().

We can know in ext4_map_blocks() that we are being called after a write has
already completed by looking at the flags.  One solution to get around this
double-zeroing would be to change the above test to:

+                 if (IS_XIP(inode) && !(flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT)) {

This fixes the tests I've been able to come up with, but I'm not certain it's
the correct fix for the long term.  It seems wasteful to zero the blocks we're
allocating, just to have the zeros overwritten immediately by a write.  Maybe
a cleaner way would be to try and zero the unwritten bits inside of
ext4_convert_unwritten_extents(), or somewhere similar?

It's worth noting that I don't think the direct I/O path has this kind of
logic because they don't allow partial block writes.  The regular I/O path
knows to zero unwritten space based on the BH_New flag, as set via the
set_buffer_new() call in ext4_da_map_blocks().  This is a pretty different I/O
path, though, so I'm not sure how much we can borrow for the XIP code.

Thoughts on the correct fix?

- Ross

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-02-11 23:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-16  1:24 [PATCH v5 00/22] Rewrite XIP code and add XIP support to ext4 Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24 ` [PATCH v5 01/22] Fix XIP fault vs truncate race Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24 ` [PATCH v5 02/22] Allow page fault handlers to perform the COW Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24 ` [PATCH v5 03/22] axonram: Fix bug in direct_access Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24 ` [PATCH v5 04/22] Change direct_access calling convention Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24 ` [PATCH v5 05/22] Introduce IS_XIP(inode) Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24 ` [PATCH v5 06/22] Treat XIP like O_DIRECT Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-31 16:59   ` Jan Kara
2014-01-16  1:24 ` [PATCH v5 07/22] Rewrite XIP page fault handling Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24 ` [PATCH v5 08/22] Change xip_truncate_page to take a get_block parameter Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24 ` [PATCH v5 09/22] Remove mm/filemap_xip.c Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24 ` [PATCH v5 10/22] Remove get_xip_mem Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:46   ` Randy Dunlap
2014-01-27 13:26     ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24 ` [PATCH v5 11/22] Replace ext2_clear_xip_target with xip_clear_blocks Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24 ` [PATCH v5 12/22] ext2: Remove ext2_xip_verify_sb() Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24 ` [PATCH v5 13/22] ext2: Remove ext2_use_xip Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24 ` [PATCH v5 14/22] ext2: Remove xip.c and xip.h Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24 ` [PATCH v5 15/22] Remove CONFIG_EXT2_FS_XIP Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24 ` [PATCH v5 16/22] ext2: Remove ext2_aops_xip Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24 ` [PATCH v5 17/22] xip: Add xip_zero_page_range Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24 ` [PATCH v5 18/22] ext4: Make ext4_block_zero_page_range static Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24 ` [PATCH v5 19/22] ext4: Add XIP functionality Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24 ` [PATCH v5 20/22] ext4: Fix typos Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24 ` [PATCH v5 21/22] xip: Add reporting of major faults Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24 ` [PATCH v5 22/22] XIP: Add support for unwritten extents Matthew Wilcox
     [not found] ` <CEFDA737.22F87%matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com>
2014-01-17  0:00   ` [PATCH v5 19/22] ext4: Add XIP functionality Ross Zwisler
     [not found] ` <CEFD7DAD.22F65%matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com>
2014-01-22 22:51   ` [PATCH v5 22/22] XIP: Add support for unwritten extents Ross Zwisler
2014-01-23 12:08     ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-23 19:13       ` Ross Zwisler
     [not found]     ` <CF0C370C.235F1%willy@linux.intel.com>
2014-01-27 23:32       ` Ross Zwisler
2014-01-28  3:49         ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-23  7:48 ` [PATCH v5 00/22] Rewrite XIP code and add XIP support to ext4 Dave Chinner
2014-01-23  7:53   ` Dave Chinner
2014-01-23  9:01 ` Dave Chinner
2014-01-23 12:12   ` Wilcox, Matthew R
2014-01-28  6:06     ` Dave Chinner
2014-01-30  6:42 ` Dave Chinner
2014-01-30  9:25   ` Dave Chinner
2014-01-31  3:06     ` Dave Chinner
2014-01-31  5:45       ` Ross Zwisler
2014-01-31 13:04         ` Dave Chinner
     [not found] ` <CF1FF3EB.24114%matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com>
2014-02-11 23:12   ` Ross Zwisler [this message]
2014-02-13  0:00     ` [PATCH v5 19/22] ext4: Add XIP functionality Ross Zwisler
     [not found] ` <CF215477.24281%matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com>
2014-02-12 23:53   ` [PATCH v5 06/22] Treat XIP like O_DIRECT Ross Zwisler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.OSX.2.00.1402111536290.55274@scrumpy \
    --to=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).