linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Marc Aurèle La France" <tsi@tuyoix.net>
To: "Andreas Grünbacher" <andreas.gruenbacher@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: sysfs: Do not return POSIX ACL xattrs via listxattr()
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 17:16:08 -0600 (Mountain Daylight Time)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.WNT.2.20.1809101709260.3100@CLUIJ> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHpGcMJ9jB+Ekfvf6HUvWUr8ipoSJkS+U5arShpMwyjuc4qftg@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2910 bytes --]

On Mon, 10 Sep 2018, Andreas Grünbacher wrote:
> Am Mo., 10. Sep. 2018 schrieb Marc Aurèle La France:

>> Commit 786534b92f3ce68f4afc8a761c80b76887797b0a "tmpfs: listxattr
>> should include POSIX ACL xattrs", which first appeared in 4.5 kernels,
>> introduced a regression whereby listxattr() syscalls on anything in
>> sysfs, or its mountpoint, return the name of the two POSIX ACL xattrs,
>> but attempts to retrieve these values are denied with EOPNOTSUP.  For
>> example ...

>>         # getfattr -d --match=- /sys
>>         /sys: system.posix_acl_access: Operation not supported
>>         /sys: system.posix_acl_default: Operation not supported
>>         #

> I can confirm this regression.

>> This inconsistent behaviour confuses rsync(1) (among others) when it
>> runs into a sysfs mountpoint, even when told to not descend into it.
>> This issue occurs because simple_xattr_list() does not correctly deal
>> with cached ACLs.

>> The suggested fix below was developed with a 4.18.7 kernel, but should
>> apply, modulo patch fuzz, to any kernel >= 4.7.  A fix for 4.5 <=
>> kernels < 4.7 is trivially different, but I won't bother given such
>> kernels are no longer maintained.

>> Note that the only other simple_xattr_list() caller, shmem, avoids
>> this glitch by previously calling cache_no_acl() on all inodes it
>> creates, so perhaps sysfs/kernfs should do the same.

>> Signed-off-by: Marc Aurèle La France <tsi@tuyoix.net>

>> --- a/fs/xattr.c
>> +++ b/fs/xattr.c
>> @@ -949,13 +949,13 @@ ssize_t simple_xattr_list(struct inode *inode, struct simple_xattrs *xattrs,
>>         int err = 0;
>>
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL
>> -       if (inode->i_acl) {
>> +       if (inode->i_acl && !is_uncached_acl(inode->i_acl)) {
>>                 err = xattr_list_one(&buffer, &remaining_size,
>>                                      XATTR_NAME_POSIX_ACL_ACCESS);
>>                 if (err)
>>                         return err;
>>         }
>> -       if (inode->i_default_acl) {
>> +       if (inode->i_default_acl && !is_uncached_acl(inode->i_default_acl)) {
>>                 err = xattr_list_one(&buffer, &remaining_size,
>>                                      XATTR_NAME_POSIX_ACL_DEFAULT);
>>                 if (err)

> This seems to be a better fix, but I haven't fully verified it, yet:

> --- a/fs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/inode.c
> @@ -187,7 +187,8 @@ int inode_init_always(struct super_block *sb, struct
>     inode->i_mapping = mapping;
>     INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&inode->i_dentry);    /* buggered by rcu freeing */
>  #ifdef CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL
> -    inode->i_acl = inode->i_default_acl = ACL_NOT_CACHED;
> +    inode->i_acl = inode->i_default_acl =
> +           (sb->s_flags & SB_POSIXACL) ? ACL_NOT_CACHED : NULL;
>  #endif
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_FSNOTIFY

Yes, that works too, and doesn't seem to cause other issues.

Tested-by: Marc Aurèle La France <tsi@tuyoix.net>

Thanks.

Marc.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-11  4:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-09 21:54 sysfs: Do not return POSIX ACL xattrs via listxattr() Marc Aurele La France
2018-09-10 20:53 ` Andreas Grünbacher
2018-09-10 23:16   ` Marc Aurèle La France [this message]
2018-09-17 14:01     ` Marc Aurèle La France

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.WNT.2.20.1809101709260.3100@CLUIJ \
    --to=tsi@tuyoix.net \
    --cc=agruenba@redhat.com \
    --cc=andreas.gruenbacher@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).