From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Alexey Gladkov <legion@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
io-uring@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 0/1] pipe: only enable the extra wake_up(rd_wait) for edge-triggered consumers
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 14:24:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <amdN6_UX9o1i-ceI@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <amdNxsTODR4MCl3R@redhat.com>
pipe_poll() unconditionally sets poll_usage on the first call, forcing
anon_pipe_write() to wake up readers on every write even if the pipe was
not empty. But this is only needed for edge-triggered consumers: epoll
with EPOLLET and io_uring without (unsupported) IORING_POLL_ADD_LEVEL.
poll() and select() users pay for it for no reason.
Change pipe_poll() to set ->pipe_usage only if wait->_key & EPOLLET is
true, this check should catch both users.
While at it, add READ_ONCE() in anon_pipe_write() to pair with WRITE_ONCE()
in pipe_poll().
Test-case for epoll:
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/epoll.h>
#include <assert.h>
int main(void)
{
int pfd[2], efd;
struct epoll_event evt = { .events = EPOLLIN | EPOLLET };
pipe(pfd);
efd = epoll_create1(0);
epoll_ctl(efd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfd[0], &evt);
for (int i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
write(pfd[1], "", 1);
assert(epoll_wait(efd, &evt, 1, 0) == 1);
}
return 0;
}
Test-case for io_uring:
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/mman.h>
#include <sys/epoll.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <linux/io_uring.h>
#include <assert.h>
int main(void)
{
struct io_uring_params p = {};
int fd, pfd[2];
pipe(pfd);
fd = syscall(SYS_io_uring_setup, 2, &p);
assert(fd >= 0);
void *ring = mmap(0, p.cq_off.cqes + p.cq_entries * sizeof(struct io_uring_cqe),
PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, IORING_OFF_SQ_RING);
assert(ring != MAP_FAILED);
*(unsigned *)(ring + p.sq_off.tail) = 1;
struct io_uring_sqe *sqes = mmap(0, p.sq_entries * sizeof(*sqes),
PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, IORING_OFF_SQES);
assert(sqes != MAP_FAILED);
sqes[0].opcode = IORING_OP_POLL_ADD;
sqes[0].fd = pfd[0];
sqes[0].len = IORING_POLL_ADD_MULTI;
sqes[0].poll32_events = EPOLLIN;
syscall(SYS_io_uring_enter, fd, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0);
unsigned *cq_head = ring + p.cq_off.head;
unsigned *cq_tail = ring + p.cq_off.tail;
for (int i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
write(pfd[1], "", 1);
syscall(SYS_io_uring_enter, fd, 0, 0, IORING_ENTER_GETEVENTS, 0, 0);
assert(*cq_tail == ++*cq_head);
}
return 0;
}
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
fs/pipe.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/pipe.c b/fs/pipe.c
index 429b0714ec57..98b1e2385103 100644
--- a/fs/pipe.c
+++ b/fs/pipe.c
@@ -689,7 +689,7 @@ anon_pipe_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
* Epoll nonsensically wants a wakeup whether the pipe
* was already empty or not.
*/
- if (was_empty || pipe->poll_usage)
+ if (was_empty || READ_ONCE(pipe->poll_usage))
wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&pipe->rd_wait, EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM);
kill_fasync(&pipe->fasync_readers, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
if (wake_next_writer)
@@ -752,7 +752,6 @@ static long pipe_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
}
}
-/* No kernel lock held - fine */
static __poll_t
pipe_poll(struct file *filp, poll_table *wait)
{
@@ -761,7 +760,9 @@ pipe_poll(struct file *filp, poll_table *wait)
union pipe_index idx;
/* Epoll has some historical nasty semantics, this enables them */
- if (unlikely(!READ_ONCE(pipe->poll_usage)))
+ if ((filp->f_mode & FMODE_READ) &&
+ wait && (wait->_key & EPOLLET) &&
+ unlikely(!READ_ONCE(pipe->poll_usage)))
WRITE_ONCE(pipe->poll_usage, true);
/*
--
2.52.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-27 12:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-27 12:23 [RFC PATCH v 0/1] pipe: only enable the extra wake_up(rd_wait) for edge-triggered consumers Oleg Nesterov
2026-07-27 12:24 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2026-07-27 12:28 ` [RFC PATCH v2 " Oleg Nesterov
2026-07-27 12:28 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=amdN6_UX9o1i-ceI@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=legion@kernel.org \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox