Linux filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@meta.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, hch@lst.de, brauner@kernel.org,
	djwong@kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/5] block: validate direct I/O memory alignment
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 14:03:07 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ampce7mxSmxAwAiu@kbusch-mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fbe9e74d-c389-46f4-9874-3e9ffd9c91d3@kernel.dk>

On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 01:18:40PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 7/29/26 1:15 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 01:10:52PM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
> >> This addresses the misaligned direct-io problem behind various threads:
> > 
> > Hi Jens, have you had a chance to look at this one yet? This addresses
> > previous issues with certain device mappers under direct io.
> 
> I they look fine, but at this point we should toss them into 7.3. Yes
> I know there are regressions around this, but from 6.1x days. And the
> series doesn't apply to the current block-7.2 anyway.

This series is kind of old at this point, but yes, it's not fixing a new
regression either. I'm okay if this goes to the next window, and I will
handle the stable follow-up.

Are you planning to start the for-7.3/block branch soon? I can rebase
the series if there's a conflict, and would be great to get this exposed
to linux-next.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-29 20:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-20 20:10 [PATCH RESEND 0/5] block: validate direct I/O memory alignment Keith Busch
2026-07-20 20:10 ` [PATCH RESEND 1/5] block: use blkdev_iov_iter_get_pages status for errors Keith Busch
2026-07-20 20:10 ` [PATCH RESEND 2/5] block: fix dio leak on metadata mapping error Keith Busch
2026-07-20 20:10 ` [PATCH RESEND 3/5] loop: set dma_alignment from the backing file for direct I/O Keith Busch
2026-07-20 20:10 ` [PATCH RESEND 4/5] zloop: set dma_alignment from the backing files " Keith Busch
2026-07-20 20:10 ` [PATCH RESEND 5/5] block: validate user space vectors during extraction Keith Busch
2026-07-29 19:15 ` [PATCH RESEND 0/5] block: validate direct I/O memory alignment Keith Busch
2026-07-29 19:18   ` Jens Axboe
2026-07-29 20:03     ` Keith Busch [this message]
2026-07-29 23:34       ` Jens Axboe
2026-07-30 11:26       ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-30 12:52         ` Keith Busch
2026-07-30 16:22           ` Jens Axboe
2026-07-30 13:25         ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2026-07-30 16:23           ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ampce7mxSmxAwAiu@kbusch-mbp \
    --to=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox