From: Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>
To: vova tokarev <vladimirelitokarev@gmail.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, security@kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: BadBunny: UFFDIO_COPY shmem killpriv bypass leading to local privilege escalation
Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2026 13:17:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ancYCBUT8aB0qHwz@pedro-suse.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGBKPgOfbMJruqcegJca6BBpEtpd91s5ASF_VU+gucWsjwp8WA@mail.gmail.com>
I'm adding a bunch of fs people that might have opinions about this. Please
see the rest of the thread below.
On Sat, Aug 08, 2026 at 12:13:06PM +0300, vova tokarev wrote:
> Pedro,
>
> Thanks for the review. Let me address both points.
>
> On the page fault comparison:
>
> UFFDIO_COPY is not comparable to a page fault. Page faults serve
> existing page cache content (read-like). UFFDIO_COPY adds new,
A page fault can also write to the page cache. On MAP_SHARED mappings.
>
> user-controlled content to the shmem page cache (write-like).
>
> The correct comparison is to write(), which calls file_modified()
>
> -> __remove_privs() to strip SUID/SGID.
>
>
> This is exactly the reasoning used when fallocate() was fixed
>
> across XFS (commit fbe7e5200365), ext4, and f2fs to call
>
> file_modified(). The XFS commit message says:
>
> "as various fallocate modes can change the file contents [...]
>
> we should drop file privileges like suid just like we do for a
>
> regular write()"
I can't speak for fallocate, or other system calls. As far as I'm aware,
this is a best-effort kind of thing. As I said, writing to a MAP_SHARED
mapping does not clear the setuid bit. It's a super trivial thing to do,
too. But it's not a problem because setuid executables are not world-writable.
I simply don't think this can feasibly be a security boundary, considering
how much it has been historically screwed up, and how the second-most basic
way to write to a file Just Bypasses It. I also don't know a single setuid
program that's packaged as 04777. Do you?
>
> UFFDIO_COPY on shmem changes file contents.
>
> It should drop file privileges like suid, just like write().
>
>
> On the PoC setup and exploitability:
>
> The PoC uses mode 04777 for simplicity of demonstration,
>
> but the underlying bug is a killpriv invariant violation:
>
> every VFS write path calls file_modified() to strip SUID on
>
> content modification, but shmem_mfill_filemap_add() does not.
>
> The killpriv mechanism is defense-in-depth - if file permissions
>
> alone were sufficient to protect SUID, the kernel wouldn't bother
>
> stripping SUID on write(). But it does, because writable SUID files
>
> do occur in practice (group-writable SUID binaries, POSIX ACLs,
>
> container shared mounts, chained with a separate write-access bug).
>
>
> For precedent: CVE-2023-0386 (overlayfs copy-up preserving SUID
>
> across namespaces) is the same class of bug - a kernel code path
>
> that modifies or copies file content without stripping SUID -
>
> and was scored CVSS 7.8 and added to CISA's KEV catalog.
>
> The fallocate killpriv fixes were backported to all stable trees.
>
>
> Additionally, this path is available even with
>
> vm.unprivileged_userfaultfd=0, since UFFD_USER_MODE_ONLY
>
> bypasses the privilege check (userfaultfd_syscall_allowed()
>
> returns true unconditionally for USER_MODE_ONLY).
>
> The kernel considers this path safe for unprivileged use,
>
> yet it skips killpriv.
>
>
> *On the fix:*
>
> Regardless of how we classify severity, the fix is trivial and makes
>
> UFFDIO_COPY consistent with every other write path -
>
> add file_modified() to shmem_mfill_filemap_add().
>
> I'm happy to submit a patch if you'd like.
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Vladimir
>
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2026 at 5:14 PM Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 07, 2026 at 01:40:41PM +0300, vova tokarev wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > It's been almost two months since I sent this report, and I haven't
> > > heard back. I'd really appreciate any feedback when you get a chance.
> > >
> > > I've rechecked both mainline master and stable 6.12.95 -- the
> > > vulnerability remains unfixed in both trees:
> > >
> > > 1. mm/shmem.c: shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() (6.12) /
> > shmem_mfill_filemap_add()
> > > (7.x) still adds pages to the page cache without calling
> > file_modified()
> > > or __remove_privs(). Writing to a SUID binary on tmpfs via UFFDIO_COPY
> > > preserves the setuid bit.
> > >
> > > 2. mm/userfaultfd.c: I noticed commit 85668fda932a added retry state
> > > tracking on master, but MFILL_RETRY_STATE_VMA_FLAGS still does not
> > > include VMA_WRITE_BIT -- the mprotect TOCTOU remains exploitable.
> > >
> > > This is a deterministic local privilege escalation (no race timing
> > > needed for the killpriv bypass), affects every kernel since 4.11
> > > (8+ years), and works on any system with userfaultfd + tmpfs (the
> > > default on virtually all distributions).
> > >
> > > I have a full working PoC that gets uid=0 from uid=1000 reliably.
> > > Happy to provide any additional information if needed.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Vladimir
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> > > From: vova tokarev <vladimirelitokarev@gmail.com>
> > > Date: Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 12:37 PM
> > > Subject: BadBunny: UFFDIO_COPY shmem killpriv bypass leading to local
> > > privilege escalation
> > > To: <security@kernel.org>
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I found a local privilege escalation (BadBunny) in the userfaultfd +
> > > shmem subsystems that affects all Linux kernels from 4.11 to 7.1
> > > (every major distribution: Ubuntu, Debian, Fedora, RHEL, SUSE, Arch,
> > > Android, ChromeOS, and any system with CONFIG_USERFAULTFD=y and a
> > > tmpfs/shmem mount).
> > >
> > > Two bugs are chained:
> > >
> > > 1. TOCTOU in UFFDIO_COPY retry path (mm/userfaultfd.c):
> > > mfill_retry_state_changed() does not re-validate VM_WRITE after
> > > dropping and re-acquiring the mmap lock in mfill_copy_folio_retry().
> > > A concurrent mprotect(PROT_READ) installs a writable PTE into a
> > > now-read-only VMA.
> >
> > This sounds like a bug, but not really exploitable.
> >
> > >
> > > 2. Missing killpriv in shmem UFFDIO_COPY (mm/shmem.c):
> > > shmem_mfill_filemap_add() adds pages to the shmem page cache
> > > without calling file_modified()/killpriv. This preserves SUID/SGID
> > > bits when file content is replaced via UFFDIO_COPY, unlike normal
> > > write() which strips them.
> > >
> > > NOTE: The killpriv bypass (Bug 2) does not require
> > > unprivileged userfaultfd and works even with
> > vm.unprivileged_userfaultfd=0,
> > > since UFFDIO_COPY on shmem is available to any process that can open
> > > a tmpfs file O_RDWR and call userfaultfd with UFFD_USER_MODE_ONLY.
> >
> > Who made the suid file world-writable? Note that this is not a bug, page
> > fault paths don't clear the suid bit either.
> >
> > >
> > > An unprivileged user can replace the content of a SUID-root binary on
> > > tmpfs via UFFDIO_COPY while preserving its setuid permission, then
> > > execute it to obtain root.
> > >
> > > The attack is deterministic (no timing dependency for the killpriv
> > > bypass), requires no heap spraying, and bypasses all modern kernel
> > > mitigations (KASLR, SMEP, SMAP, CFI, PAC, heap hardening).
> > >
> > > Affected versions: Linux 4.11+ (since shmem UFFDIO_COPY support,
> > > commit 4c27fe4c4c84 "userfaultfd: shmem: add shmem_mcopy_atomic_pte")
> >
> > This sounds like a bug, but not really exploitable.
> > > Confirmed on: 7.1.0 (aarch64)
> > > Affected distros: All major distributions (Ubuntu, Debian, Fedora,
> > > RHEL, SUSE, Arch, Android, ChromeOS) that have CONFIG_USERFAULTFD=y
> > > and tmpfs mounted (virtually all Linux systems)
> > >
> > > Attached files:
> > > - bad_bunny.c Full LPE exploit (uid=1000 to
> > > uid=0) Build: gcc -static -O2 -pthread
> > > - suidhelper.c Standalone SUID payload
> > binary
> > > Build: gcc -static -O2
> > > - uffdio_copy_lpe_report.md Detailed writeup with root cause,
> > > reproduction steps, and suggested fix
> > > - badbunny_demo.mp4 PoC demo clip
> > >
> > > The PoC (bad_bunny.c) sets up a SUID target on tmpfs, drops to
> >
> > Since the exploit isn't public, I assume you set up the tmpfs file as root
> > and world writable. This is not an LPE.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Pedro
> >
--
Pedro
next parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-08 12:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAGBKPgOm8q-8_rwyRPEmSj8JXdh_GaK1Q8vpJ=j-+yA0SgcNQw@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAGBKPgPPALX_5CQJAKUNjwi2fD28pBeS5pRuwQgePU93pOy8EA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <anXnHMInq_JLYbWc@pedro-suse.lan>
[not found] ` <CAGBKPgOfbMJruqcegJca6BBpEtpd91s5ASF_VU+gucWsjwp8WA@mail.gmail.com>
2026-08-08 12:17 ` Pedro Falcato [this message]
2026-08-10 4:05 ` Fwd: BadBunny: UFFDIO_COPY shmem killpriv bypass leading to local privilege escalation Matthew Wilcox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ancYCBUT8aB0qHwz@pedro-suse.lan \
--to=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=security@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=vladimirelitokarev@gmail.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox