From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pj2-f39.google.com (mail-pj2-f39.google.com [74.125.227.167]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C72A3437479 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2026 20:06:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.227.167 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790885191; cv=none; b=d3vtzpViFgCbc5+DoJ/7gUhW7ynZjdDBpyIKS365/Q9ZeTdebvS6rKXZnPVpmc6TAjppGpmwHLNtOvNlZm3LgmiPgDnAZWtIiwz+mfUpL/Orc5a19aUubM4VXJXQedXz7QugDDvHCLVCeGhMviqt8tMkPglUnCvLLiQL26vOo64= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790885191; c=relaxed/simple; bh=itH6vbMqVbMJFlSOzycQd4i1lZJJhxPN2ByoF1230/I=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=UPG3Fbo06NHkPGK6gdEAGvUXD75/MFR3WIVU7VYNh+nWCwTY6T6gr1k8EBKeCeiDAzpH/KeYgh8BtR0pmNSoiuYYuE4/dHGsDHaF5nc/ZX1WQ+eajtyPZrfT0OAiKuOtyzGEMW9KOzPk9eawanGs1bQTKtJ/KgBCd5Mpm8ES3pY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=dama.to; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=dama.to; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dama-to.20251104.gappssmtp.com header.i=@dama-to.20251104.gappssmtp.com header.b=w9rMd0Hk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.227.167 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=dama.to Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=dama.to Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dama-to.20251104.gappssmtp.com header.i=@dama-to.20251104.gappssmtp.com header.b="w9rMd0Hk" Received: by mail-pj2-f39.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-3a4805e15cfso2625306a91.0 for ; Thu, 01 Oct 2026 13:06:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dama-to.20251104.gappssmtp.com; s=20251104; t=1790885188; x=1791489988; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type:mime-version :references:mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=grsKZ1OSZx24kS0KKL4KN4ISoNfQyaFFM1VYosHh8gg=; b=w9rMd0Hk+ZowXQ/lND2xLY7F3ULhmQarHLxnV8DxrNfYf6fnLC7OVT/rKuVneGV0pr bu24hYzRhqZrmlLBHkwHumGGwxBsFmLh6TEiF0tGqgefrJFgTKJX4An4IG5fz6yHHXiU BF47F1Sm/NO8tFdFldO8VxSnSK+wX7NZpBm2+ZEmsMEPIDIK0iZbxgalzK4Q1F1Bhw2D XSIW5vRGss3h1EzK/JT0+5ruit9zGmwJ6eFQkb9Y9pZHcfUSdpNtlYmwmXXLz4YpcMvw i6yhw63usOXO7nCMaOZusvC6RH0VhOMJxW2K94TffckNPbBVGqHeBS1m+YjRZ2wVBi97 KDig== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20260707; t=1790885188; x=1791489988; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type:mime-version :references:mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to:content-type; bh=grsKZ1OSZx24kS0KKL4KN4ISoNfQyaFFM1VYosHh8gg=; b=pFAYolHl6tkGhpHvOgHVhsDI6YOnWj4bIAd/kBvjE9QNfN/wD4+xgkpsImBBjdYqA2 xYk/0sJVpKkQX+xAc4BqJXhunJClhuaf6jnefMUCzkLYHwewFXu7KQq7gQdazd28wmwV RPQCsb74xcpozJ9HHymJaPT3FP0fXIbSxcmZpNnc7D/kudOGKVh0VOLoN5lmkyfOGLD6 9BksM+yd+ynmXiAk5n7rFmpJ0hpqznUVVRGQ7hlsVo6GwLUTpMxyjEMTpKRHF0N7iL4U dRPEb7b17XGypJvZ1lIkBI2dfzp4pBm+RUfRF6ej9q25hydAameCpKcufVilTVExHw+Q tcVA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AKwUvBzPYpxqUOoxeVGhkv6UrvCM+AvXsX0k3qlCx5uukywkTsEp9z/cIuoC7WxpaPzVxqFISh2yFoi+NBCHa8XO@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AFq9FYI4xnDxfXqQXEAthj4ZRdtT5sLZ2BQgqQ6ReJ0k6fvptC1J0yKV 4DiUhOwJJiMw91xilVoswNgm0lUWIFX257FWJj9Sn91ACYSFgc9pE9wrtnYTh2Lo/iE= X-Gm-Gg: AYBFou0dgpmhhqN/bx4PyEnN2qBrS64GGk3astMINx5mDhYRjWJ5lh8xE8ZDgnCTNlS mEdTi5t5O7eUN20K+iRWhxsTc9cN+s4Rdv4MpnWHztc1jp2l8D8MAlTXPHYimXESN3hqHt/1lxw vCh1q4uTx6zK2QB+5gpsDZxGiMXQeKYis+RZfPjMQyb2K65szY3o+zyuxqlUt4Xfipgc0qgj8Le 7eL80tfph8od8jDm4kYXBhm/9zocBmSAytNMIBFycd0Ed15Pp1BW6/yvjFpfEh7fJ85Hu1gaho2 MJR0qVDmfol+XjT0ILjIg71wSY4zjHp5yAfffK2/G/OJSLOB9BsNxJJ2G1V9aINW9InLLlQPXX6 NC4rBkKWHSC0MmuqFLFObNYwIwci0gI4TG697GwrSFs1gMfZ+LOPpB6CRFF4jp/jcLtD9wS2cte EO2HlYTvVVJuFgB8mD125VjCoNPROH5ZWuvAARR2qxr7okF1SnbA0oT9rU6BvBwEbY2cGeuXSWN noHp4WSYj0= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4c06:b0:3a4:a2f9:f2f9 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-3a6cec2c079mr577802a91.52.1790885187917; Thu, 01 Oct 2026 13:06:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2a03:2880:2ff:5::]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-3a6dd135d8asm39150a91.3.2026.10.01.13.06.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 01 Oct 2026 13:06:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2026 13:06:26 -0700 From: Joe Damato To: hengyul@cs.unc.edu Cc: brauner@kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jack@suse.cz, jirislaby@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] eventpoll: return -ENOIOCTLCMD for unknown ioctl commands Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Joe Damato , hengyul@cs.unc.edu, brauner@kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jack@suse.cz, jirislaby@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20260924185747.2166326-1-hengyul@cs.unc.edu> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260924185747.2166326-1-hengyul@cs.unc.edu> On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 02:57:47PM -0400, hengyul@cs.unc.edu wrote: > From: Hengyu Liang > > Before commit 18e2bf0edf4d ("eventpoll: Add epoll ioctl for > epoll_params"), epoll files had no ioctl handler, so ioctl() on an epoll > file descriptor failed with ENOTTY. That commit introduced the > EPIOCSPARAMS and EPIOCGPARAMS commands, but ep_eventpoll_ioctl() returns > -EINVAL for any other command, so since v6.9 every other ioctl() on an > epoll file descriptor fails with EINVAL instead of ENOTTY. > > Documentation/driver-api/ioctl.rst says that an ioctl handler must > return -ENOTTY or -ENOIOCTLCMD for an unknown command, and that > returning -EINVAL there is wrong. Returning -ENOIOCTLCMD was also the > intent of the original series, whose changelog since v3 [1] says "when > an unknown ioctl is received, -ENOIOCTLCMD is returned instead of > -EINVAL as the ioctl documentation requires", and ep_eventpoll_bp_ioctl() > does return -ENOIOCTLCMD for unknown commands. However, > ep_eventpoll_ioctl() only passes EPIOCSPARAMS and EPIOCGPARAMS to it and > handles all other commands in its own default case, which returns > -EINVAL, so that path is never reached. > > This is visible to userspace. For example, isatty(), ttyname() and > tcgetattr() on an epoll file descriptor set errno to EINVAL, while they > set ENOTTY for any other file descriptor that does not refer to a > terminal, as they also did for epoll file descriptors before v6.9. > > Return -ENOIOCTLCMD from the default case, which the VFS turns into > -ENOTTY, and update the epoll_busy_poll selftest, which expected EINVAL > for an unknown command. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240125225704.12781-1-jdamato@fastly.com > > Fixes: 18e2bf0edf4d ("eventpoll: Add epoll ioctl for epoll_params") > Signed-off-by: Hengyu Liang > --- > fs/eventpoll.c | 2 +- > tools/testing/selftests/net/epoll_busy_poll.c | 4 ++-- > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Joe Damato