From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Joel Granados <joel.granados@kernel.org>,
Allison Henderson <achender@kernel.org>
Cc: kernel test robot <yi1.lai@intel.com>,
oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com,
rds-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: Re: [linus:master] [sysctl] 8d75c338f0: BUG:KASAN:slab-use-after-free_in_touch_wq_lockdep_map
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 17:35:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <atY42k00k0Waj6o4@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <atYuE1xnVYe0BDG4@redhat.com>
On 10/19, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> But. rds_init() can also fail even if CONFIG_SYSCTL=y, after
> rds_sysctl_init(), so to me this looks like a bug in net/rds/.
>
>
> In any case, I guess net/rds/ init paths should not fail if
> CONFIG_SYSCTL=n ?
So I think that something like the uncompiled/untested patch below makes
sense anyway even if doesn't fix all the potential problems with rds_wq.
What do you think?
Oleg.
---
diff --git a/net/rds/ib_sysctl.c b/net/rds/ib_sysctl.c
index 2af678e71e3c..bccdb5c4df1d 100644
--- a/net/rds/ib_sysctl.c
+++ b/net/rds/ib_sysctl.c
@@ -36,19 +36,10 @@
#include "ib.h"
-static struct ctl_table_header *rds_ib_sysctl_hdr;
-
unsigned long rds_ib_sysctl_max_send_wr = RDS_IB_DEFAULT_SEND_WR;
unsigned long rds_ib_sysctl_max_recv_wr = RDS_IB_DEFAULT_RECV_WR;
unsigned long rds_ib_sysctl_max_recv_allocation = (128 * 1024 * 1024) / RDS_FRAG_SIZE;
-static unsigned long rds_ib_sysctl_max_wr_min = 1;
-/* hardware will fail CQ creation long before this */
-static unsigned long rds_ib_sysctl_max_wr_max = (u32)~0;
-
unsigned long rds_ib_sysctl_max_unsig_wrs = 16;
-static unsigned long rds_ib_sysctl_max_unsig_wr_min = 1;
-static unsigned long rds_ib_sysctl_max_unsig_wr_max = 64;
-
/*
* This sysctl does nothing.
*
@@ -61,6 +52,14 @@ static unsigned long rds_ib_sysctl_max_unsig_wr_max = 64;
*/
unsigned int rds_ib_sysctl_flow_control = 0;
+#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
+static unsigned long rds_ib_sysctl_max_wr_min = 1;
+/* hardware will fail CQ creation long before this */
+static unsigned long rds_ib_sysctl_max_wr_max = (u32)~0;
+
+static unsigned long rds_ib_sysctl_max_unsig_wr_min = 1;
+static unsigned long rds_ib_sysctl_max_unsig_wr_max = 64;
+
static struct ctl_table rds_ib_sysctl_table[] = {
{
.procname = "max_send_wr",
@@ -105,6 +104,8 @@ static struct ctl_table rds_ib_sysctl_table[] = {
},
};
+static struct ctl_table_header *rds_ib_sysctl_hdr;
+
void rds_ib_sysctl_exit(void)
{
if (rds_ib_sysctl_hdr)
@@ -118,3 +119,15 @@ int rds_ib_sysctl_init(void)
return -ENOMEM;
return 0;
}
+
+#else
+
+void rds_ib_sysctl_exit(void)
+{
+}
+
+int rds_ib_sysctl_init(void)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+#endif
diff --git a/net/rds/sysctl.c b/net/rds/sysctl.c
index 025f518a4349..a0673a41633a 100644
--- a/net/rds/sysctl.c
+++ b/net/rds/sysctl.c
@@ -36,11 +36,6 @@
#include "rds.h"
-static struct ctl_table_header *rds_sysctl_reg_table;
-
-static unsigned long rds_sysctl_reconnect_min = 1;
-static unsigned long rds_sysctl_reconnect_max = ~0UL;
-
unsigned long rds_sysctl_reconnect_min_jiffies;
unsigned long rds_sysctl_reconnect_max_jiffies = HZ;
@@ -49,6 +44,10 @@ unsigned int rds_sysctl_max_unacked_bytes = (16 << 20);
unsigned int rds_sysctl_ping_enable = 1;
+#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
+static unsigned long rds_sysctl_reconnect_min = 1;
+static unsigned long rds_sysctl_reconnect_max = ~0UL;
+
static struct ctl_table rds_sysctl_rds_table[] = {
{
.procname = "reconnect_min_delay_ms",
@@ -91,6 +90,8 @@ static struct ctl_table rds_sysctl_rds_table[] = {
},
};
+static struct ctl_table_header *rds_sysctl_reg_table;
+
void rds_sysctl_exit(void)
{
unregister_net_sysctl_table(rds_sysctl_reg_table);
@@ -107,3 +108,15 @@ int rds_sysctl_init(void)
return -ENOMEM;
return 0;
}
+
+#else
+
+void rds_sysctl_exit(void)
+{
+}
+
+int rds_sysctl_init(void)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+#endif
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-19 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-19 1:46 [linus:master] [sysctl] 8d75c338f0: BUG:KASAN:slab-use-after-free_in_touch_wq_lockdep_map kernel test robot
2026-10-19 11:41 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-10-19 13:30 ` Joel Granados
2026-10-19 14:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-10-19 15:35 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2026-10-19 19:52 ` Allison Henderson
2026-10-20 9:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-10-20 10:51 ` Joel Granados
2026-10-20 10:43 ` Joel Granados
2026-10-20 11:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-10-20 9:06 ` Joel Granados
2026-10-20 9:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-10-20 7:55 ` Joel Granados
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=atY42k00k0Waj6o4@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=achender@kernel.org \
--cc=joel.granados@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=rds-devel@oss.oracle.com \
--cc=wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com \
--cc=yi1.lai@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox