linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org,
	brauner@kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com, jack@suse.cz,
	willy@infradead.org, yi.zhang@huawei.com,
	chengzhihao1@huawei.com, yukuai3@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] iomap: advance the ifs allocation if we have more than one blocks per folio
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 15:08:25 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b098d15b-4b80-2b73-d05b-f4dbb5d4631a@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZrxBfKi_DpThYo94@infradead.org>

On 2024/8/14 13:32, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 08:11:56PM +0800, Zhang Yi wrote:
>> From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
>>
>> Now we allocate ifs if i_blocks_per_folio is larger than one when
>> writing back dirty folios in iomap_writepage_map(), so we don't attach
>> an ifs after buffer write to an entire folio until it starts writing
>> back, if we partial truncate that folio, iomap_invalidate_folio() can't
>> clear counterpart block's dirty bit as expected. Fix this by advance the
>> ifs allocation to __iomap_write_begin().
> 
> Wouldn't it make more sense to only allocate the ifѕ in
> iomap_invalidate_folio when it actually is needed?
> 

Therefore, you mean current strategy of allocating ifs is to try to delay
the allocation time as much as possible? The advantage is that it could
avoid some unnecessary allocation operations if the whole folio are
invalidated before write back. right?

> Also do you have a reproducer for this?
> 

This mistake doesn't case any real problem now, because once the folio
has been partial truncated, the counterpart range becomes a hole, although
the ifs dirty bit is not cleared, iomap_writepage_map_blocks() can deal
with it and won't cause any problem. Hence I don't have reproducer for
this.

Thanks,
Yi.


  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-14  7:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-12 12:11 [PATCH v2 0/6] iomap: some minor non-critical fixes and improvements when block size < folio size Zhang Yi
2024-08-12 12:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] iomap: correct the range of a partial dirty clear Zhang Yi
2024-08-12 16:33   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-13  2:14     ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-14  1:53     ` Dave Chinner
2024-08-12 12:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] iomap: support invalidating partial folios Zhang Yi
2024-08-12 16:55   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-12 12:11 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] iomap: advance the ifs allocation if we have more than one blocks per folio Zhang Yi
2024-08-12 12:47   ` yangerkun
2024-08-13  2:21     ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-14  5:32   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-14  7:08     ` Zhang Yi [this message]
2024-08-15  6:00       ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-16  1:44         ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-17  4:27     ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-17  4:42       ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-08-17  6:16         ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-12 12:11 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] iomap: correct the dirty length in page mkwrite Zhang Yi
2024-08-12 16:45   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-13  2:49     ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-14  5:36   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-14  7:49     ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-15  5:59       ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-16  2:19         ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-17  4:45   ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-08-17  6:43     ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-12 12:11 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] iomap: don't mark blocks uptodate after partial zeroing Zhang Yi
2024-08-12 16:49   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-13  3:01     ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-14  5:39   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-17  4:48   ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-08-17  7:16     ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-12 12:11 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] iomap: reduce unnecessary state_lock when setting ifs uptodate and dirty bits Zhang Yi
2024-08-12 16:54   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-12 17:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-08-13  8:15     ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-14  1:49 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] iomap: some minor non-critical fixes and improvements when block size < folio size Dave Chinner
2024-08-14  2:14   ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-14  2:47     ` Dave Chinner
2024-08-14  3:57       ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-14  5:16         ` Dave Chinner
2024-08-14  6:32           ` Zhang Yi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b098d15b-4b80-2b73-d05b-f4dbb5d4631a@huaweicloud.com \
    --to=yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).