From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
To: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Problem with data=ordered ext4 mount option in linux-next
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 16:34:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b1fa8d59-02e8-16b7-7218-a3f6ac66e3fa@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211217152456.l7b2mbefdkk64fkj@work>
On 17.12.2021 16:24, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 04:11:32PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> On linux-next systemd-remount-fs complains about an invalid mount option
>> here, resulting in a r/o root fs. After playing with the mount options
>> it turned out that data=ordered causes the problem. linux-next from Dec
>> 1st was ok, so it seems to be related to the new mount API patches.
>>
>> At a first glance I saw no obvious problem, the following looks good.
>> Maybe you have an idea where to look ..
>>
>> static const struct constant_table ext4_param_data[] = {
>> {"journal", EXT4_MOUNT_JOURNAL_DATA},
>> {"ordered", EXT4_MOUNT_ORDERED_DATA},
>> {"writeback", EXT4_MOUNT_WRITEBACK_DATA},
>> {}
>> };
>>
>> fsparam_enum ("data", Opt_data, ext4_param_data),
>>
>
> Thank you for the report!
>
> The ext4 mount has been reworked to use the new mount api and the work
> has been applied to linux-next couple of days ago so I definitelly
> assume there is a bug in there that I've missed. I will be looking into
> it.
>
> Can you be a little bit more specific about how to reproduce the problem
> as well as the error it generates in the logs ? Any other mount options
> used simultaneously, non-default file system features, or mount options
> stored within the superblock ?
>
> Can you reproduce it outside of the systemd unit, say a script ?
>
Yes:
[root@zotac ~]# mount -o remount,data=ordered /
mount: /: mount point not mounted or bad option.
[root@zotac ~]# mount -o remount,discard /
[root@zotac ~]#
"systemctl status systemd-remount-fs" shows the same error.
Following options I had in my fstab (ext4 fs):
rw,relatime,data=ordered,discard
No non-default system features.
> Thanks!
> -Lukas
>
Heiner
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-17 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-17 15:11 Problem with data=ordered ext4 mount option in linux-next Heiner Kallweit
2021-12-17 15:24 ` Lukas Czerner
2021-12-17 15:34 ` Heiner Kallweit [this message]
2021-12-17 17:02 ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-12-17 18:26 ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-12-20 11:12 ` Lukas Czerner
2021-12-25 20:11 ` Sedat Dilek
2021-12-26 20:01 ` Lukas Czerner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b1fa8d59-02e8-16b7-7218-a3f6ac66e3fa@gmail.com \
--to=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).