From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
To: Julian Sun <sunjunchao@bytedance.com>, mhiramat@kernel.org
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz,
mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
vschneid@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
agruenba@redhat.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org,
roman.gushchin@linux.dev, shakeel.butt@linux.dev,
muchun.song@linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Suppress undesirable hung task warnings.
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2025 19:38:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b31a538a-c361-4e3e-a5b6-6a3d2083ef3b@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250922094146.708272-1-sunjunchao@bytedance.com>
Hi Julian
Thanks for the patch series!
On 2025/9/22 17:41, Julian Sun wrote:
> As suggested by Andrew Morton in [1], we need a general mechanism
> that allows the hung task detector to ignore unnecessary hung
Yep, I understand the goal is to suppress what can be a benign hung task
warning during memcg teardown.
> tasks. This patch set implements this functionality.
>
> Patch 1 introduces a PF_DONT_HUNG flag. The hung task detector will
> ignores all tasks that have the PF_DONT_HUNG flag set.
However, I'm concerned that the PF_DONT_HUNG flag is a bit too powerful
and might mask real, underlying hangs.
>
> Patch 2 introduces wait_event_no_hung() and wb_wait_for_completion_no_hung(),
> which enable the hung task detector to ignore hung tasks caused by these
> wait events.
Instead of making the detector ignore the task, what if we just change
the waiting mechanism? Looking at wb_wait_for_completion(), we could
introduce a new helper that internally uses wait_event_timeout() in a
loop.
Something simple like this:
void wb_wait_for_completion_no_hung(struct wb_completion *done)
{
atomic_dec(&done->cnt);
while (atomic_read(&done->cnt))
wait_event_timeout(*done->waitq,
!atomic_read(&done->cnt), timeout);
}
The periodic wake-ups from wait_event_timeout() would naturally prevent
the detector from complaining about slow but eventually completing
writeback.
>
> Patch 3 uses wb_wait_for_completion_no_hung() in the final phase of memcg
> teardown to eliminate the hung task warning.
>
> Julian Sun (3):
> sched: Introduce a new flag PF_DONT_HUNG.
> writeback: Introduce wb_wait_for_completion_no_hung().
> memcg: Don't trigger hung task when memcg is releasing.
>
> fs/fs-writeback.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> include/linux/backing-dev.h | 1 +
> include/linux/sched.h | 12 +++++++++++-
> include/linux/wait.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
> kernel/hung_task.c | 6 ++++++
> mm/memcontrol.c | 2 +-
> 6 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-22 11:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-22 9:41 [PATCH 0/3] Suppress undesirable hung task warnings Julian Sun
2025-09-22 9:41 ` [PATCH 1/3] sched: Introduce a new flag PF_DONT_HUNG Julian Sun
2025-09-22 9:41 ` [PATCH 2/3] writeback: Introduce wb_wait_for_completion_no_hung() Julian Sun
2025-09-22 9:41 ` [PATCH 3/3] memcg: Don't trigger hung task warnings when memcg is releasing resources Julian Sun
2025-09-22 11:38 ` Lance Yang [this message]
2025-09-22 12:40 ` [PATCH 0/3] Suppress undesirable hung task warnings Julian Sun
2025-09-22 13:12 ` Lance Yang
2025-09-22 21:57 ` Andrew Morton
2025-09-23 2:30 ` Lance Yang
2025-09-23 2:45 ` [External] " Julian Sun
2025-09-23 3:18 ` Lance Yang
2025-09-22 13:07 ` Michal Hocko
2025-09-22 14:24 ` [External] " Julian Sun
2025-09-22 13:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-22 14:29 ` [External] " Julian Sun
2025-09-22 15:27 ` Jan Kara
2025-09-22 18:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-22 21:50 ` Andrew Morton
2025-09-23 7:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-23 12:44 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-09-24 10:34 ` Jan Kara
2025-09-25 15:07 ` [External] " Julian Sun
2025-09-25 16:30 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b31a538a-c361-4e3e-a5b6-6a3d2083ef3b@linux.dev \
--to=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=agruenba@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=sunjunchao@bytedance.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).