From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from embla.dev.snart.me (embla.dev.snart.me [54.252.183.203]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D48D926B95B; Wed, 26 Aug 2026 04:22:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=54.252.183.203 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787718157; cv=none; b=d0YO6JTcN52iT5oV6txseyoBbRPcGsQo5LJSBYUSZ8wsi4Io77ox6RIucIYELwXSFICUPyN+nOWLf8teS9u0CnVGzXaXQubwsEOdpfnlN0GSvkE9jp6jyl0GDf68Jb4Ybn3H8wxXPmMpmWHI3xA1zOo3n1EVr+wDd0nYSIhjEPs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787718157; c=relaxed/simple; bh=SD7hhQDUH2wCoa/LN1T16MWWMsxv+imzJE63fWqfgPY=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=RfrruF8vdfMgDciOzpYKbQoWfJ/dmFqa3ot8UqabjGZIpJoQxVXiLSs1YLMUGsDK3HilDmxfZqHhD0G06yVwJpN+KuPyqgJMx8WhTjZxN36B7SfdXS+xOMxiSQy97yiMrn1nyY2Bp8X/+fQjr3SCYOOuG4zwdoe/PQAnpMH97Go= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=dev.snart.me; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dev.snart.me; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=dev.snart.me header.i=@dev.snart.me header.b=QNy3bSx0; arc=none smtp.client-ip=54.252.183.203 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=dev.snart.me Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dev.snart.me Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=dev.snart.me header.i=@dev.snart.me header.b="QNy3bSx0" Received: from embla.dev.snart.me (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by embla.dev.snart.me (Postfix) with ESMTP id 877BD1D472; Wed, 26 Aug 2026 04:22:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 embla.dev.snart.me 877BD1D472 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=dev.snart.me; s=00; t=1787718154; bh=SD7hhQDUH2wCoa/LN1T16MWWMsxv+imzJE63fWqfgPY=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=QNy3bSx05dHTD6IbxysM87Ipp0OQs6sFdhXKCaSfHBfb7wjHWP+d+ZHxnUvfv50xL Ibk0PvpUoPwI0Q5Z9lY4FwfX+oXVVzK/YD8z29ncAGfhKvJjRDzmnI+rg1ESaixwws fAStD2OUOS8i8/zjOrqvjjbGgchGSyJ15WKeuyHA= Received: from [192.168.1.18] ([182.226.25.243]) by embla.dev.snart.me with ESMTPSA id MKAODglqjmoZ9gEA8KYfjw (envelope-from ); Wed, 26 Aug 2026 04:22:33 +0000 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2026 13:22:32 +0900 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] fat: add noflush mount option To: OGAWA Hirofumi Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org References: <20260822173732.10230-1-dxdt@dev.snart.me> <871pbn6edz.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp> <787aea79-beb0-4f29-bb67-ee57f6c654c4@dev.snart.me> <87ecfmrfb9.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp> From: David Timber Content-Language: en-US, ko Autocrypt: addr=dxdt@dev.snart.me; keydata= xjMEYmJg1hYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAf5E+ri1XLtjqYbZdHOyc8oS+1/XJ5bSlbx5WHXmVBZzN IERhdmlkIFRpbWJlciA8ZHhkdEBkZXYuc25hcnQubWU+wpQEExYKADwWIQQn/Jn96EMUaIoF X+T/ldyyrZpWaAUCYmJg1gIbAwULCQgHAgMiAgEGFQoJCAsCBBYCAwECHgcCF4AACgkQ/5Xc sq2aVmjJZwD8COjPlUwccrlRvbNQ6f87DWchtYO0o8W2DNRM3RLps0EA/jEhIbRV6AsyC8jr 30Ut3aJ3/mO/6G4sLj7OvkEEBH0MzjgEYmJg1hIKKwYBBAGXVQEFAQEHQFpgtIgaByv9lIEY EmpavMO0pYjtu7TMJynwdnGYkN9LAwEIB8J4BBgWCgAgFiEEJ/yZ/ehDFGiKBV/k/5Xcsq2a VmgFAmJiYNYCGwwACgkQ/5Xcsq2aVmhFCwEA0kM9VyYB4bLCM7+SuXUUH+5Ec99Nj4RXxFad Key9GuwA/2BZK6bNyrLSfEk2JDRoskqf7OIL0wa6JOD5SrBnMe8E In-Reply-To: <87ecfmrfb9.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 8/25/26 13:31, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote: > Well, with a your patch, just remounting without "flush" option doesn't > remove flush? fat_parse_param() doesn't behave like other fs. The current implementation only accepts rw and ro for reconfig. So the option cannot be flipped up and down at will. > And this is a user visible change more or less, so if > there is an objection from users, then it will be dropped. No worries at all. I'll just sit on the patch for now and see if anyone comes to say they have a problem with it. Davo