From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Alexey Dobriyan" <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Subject: s_vfs_rename_sem and cifs (was Re: Possible deadlock in vfs layer, namei.c)
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 03:47:50 -0800
Message-ID: <b6fcc0a0603020347r32567ae9l1fe4495059149449@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from nproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.182.192]:62473 "EHLO nproxy.gmail.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932426AbWCBLrw convert rfc822-to-8bit
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 2 Mar 2006 06:47:52 -0500
Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id m18so274530nfc
        for <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>; Thu, 02 Mar 2006 03:47:51 -0800 (PST)
To: "Al Viro" <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 06:46:42PM -0800, Joshua Hudson wrote:
> from namei.c (function: lock_rename), rename takes:
> 1. s_vfs_rename_sem,

Speaking of s_vfs_rename_sem, does cifs usage of it despite explicit
warning at fs.h
was found to be legal?