From: Jan Koss <kossjan@gmail.com>
To: Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cam.ac.uk>
Cc: kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fragmentation && blocks "realloc"
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 23:58:16 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b97d23040601221258n45af03e5kfec8e96132a83462@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0601212022390.29190@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>
Hello.
>(They access the block device directly, completely
>bypassing the page cache so you are breaking cache coherency and are 100%
>broken by design.)
Oh... I thought that start from 2.4.x there are no separate implementation
of working with blocks and pages, when you read block, kernel read whole page,
am I wrong?
> They only way to help you
> is to see your whole file system code
If we need some handhold for discussion, lets talk about minix v.1
(my file system derive from this code).
Lets suppose I want make algorigth of allocation blocks in
fs/minix/bitmap.c: minix_new_block more inteligent.
I should say that minix code use sb_bread/brelse and work with pages (for
example fs/minix/dir.c).
So instead of allocation one additional block,
I want "realloc" blocks, so all file will occupy several consecutive blocks.
And we stop on such code
bh->b_blocknr = newblk;
unmap_underlying_metadata(bh->b_bdev, bh->b_blocknr);
mark_buffer_dirty (bh);
And question how should I get this _bh_, if I can not use sb_bread?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-22 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-20 11:47 fragmentation && blocks "realloc" Jan Koss
2006-01-20 13:34 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2006-01-20 15:46 ` Jan Koss
2006-01-20 19:22 ` Jan Koss
2006-01-20 20:11 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2006-01-21 9:42 ` Jan Koss
2006-01-21 20:28 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2006-01-22 20:58 ` Jan Koss [this message]
2006-01-22 21:32 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2006-01-22 22:05 ` Jan Koss
2006-01-24 10:37 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2006-02-23 21:47 ` Nate Diller
2006-01-20 20:04 ` Anton Altaparmakov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b97d23040601221258n45af03e5kfec8e96132a83462@mail.gmail.com \
--to=kossjan@gmail.com \
--cc=aia21@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).