From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh8-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh8-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.159]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 138D2171668; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 08:56:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.159 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718960213; cv=none; b=Whx2tsQkVu3tvnzBK5f/EaJ/hGZTEZ+p+MAGeeFB/Xn5tx9zi4Yd4e5MupJH1RGfd+u+Y+MovcF4Zi+rV9bOgi6kTE29e6vIIdytBsb1o8GHhGYWpjZLSFpfbfmR0N1B0XxQG2hrEH7Q044xJzNokAaY8N0J3cm7ZXl1+GRc8e0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718960213; c=relaxed/simple; bh=yVhYX7Qb1K30DljPx/XNunSHMQ4LAqLxqGqIBasoGDs=; h=MIME-Version:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From:To:Cc: Subject:Content-Type; b=qbwSlGgf0dHrC+JSrDEsGznza8P1eAJfPgbFh+dxmJMA2pf7BbR5meDXND4V2WkzzabglokWL1z6tZMSvymEw7eBgB8j5gBgGanlhVZWEnhYN4QkO8TF9g09uqmvfo/IGUqbKlugMIukF6uvbHA07xUGcZJ9XXSQ39MAUlqMP3g= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arndb.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arndb.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=arndb.de header.i=@arndb.de header.b=H7mCTDwx; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=K4cdFx4S; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.159 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arndb.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arndb.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=arndb.de header.i=@arndb.de header.b="H7mCTDwx"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="K4cdFx4S" Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailfhigh.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 153A01140210; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 04:56:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap51 ([10.202.2.101]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 21 Jun 2024 04:56:50 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=arndb.de; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1718960210; x=1719046610; bh=LCP3GPJDV8 F/N+nAlcGiBZYx7s7qKdEXuPIAtCYCsw8=; b=H7mCTDwxBhL6/3nl2kvwH7Z2jf vHvRWJWjo62xKNC7P63pFKMi0lGQH1oK9d5uLt4KZnRj6RDabX6f042YKlcBY7VL ZZq1IVlKZ2tgE49wrDxmbx5ZugEMclHbG+fKzej1xJSCVx2tZvZ3YPE5yAhRu1hX g6XV6uYI8W0AZrAHJH7GLQD/PzjDkfnuabR9xUItNv+SX/LSx1+9CeE43E1pWrsw H3/6KJ+q3UXf2HjYInaAx+URfx3SrV1MtmOIAqug46Iecs28LMSKwCe+Wulv7Yzh +lVLEByNlljBiKAtUqzaNB80GN0U3FbfHu66zSBtt4AZT/eJby+pGlrYPqRQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; t=1718960210; x=1719046610; bh=LCP3GPJDV8F/N+nAlcGiBZYx7s7q KdEXuPIAtCYCsw8=; b=K4cdFx4S224MYRT+r8L/r9U1j5q9lsA7B7hhlIrlPjWc 7EDb3ZPjlybzPs2NKQgEkl/fSHKd0CDqzFXj7P3t+qGfnRRJ78YrIYGTuI3sC43Q 6y8H6AA1V0PIijyE6xMkgGupwrnRWrZbay1fonLCHWP6Qa/M3EcTzWO0bm0ePn1Q O38dmf9if6C4B+mrVHd9kbUcCSEJwcWVo6jkCthFmcFHahki2cGoOM3KesCvklVz YT5grRrYymPqsYUACYcdY9Sp9ICM60lfM3yEmkxnIiJkr+UigAeW3QKYo6psB+j+ ytsTijk6h1ZVtxvQRM1KQbzMrZL3rRnt47XsyTlhYw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrfeefgedguddtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvfevufgtsehttdertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedftehr nhguuceuvghrghhmrghnnhdfuceorghrnhgusegrrhhnuggsrdguvgeqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepffehueegteeihfegtefhjefgtdeugfegjeelheejueethfefgeeghfektdek teffnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheprg hrnhgusegrrhhnuggsrdguvg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i56a14606:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 38B95B6008D; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 04:56:48 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.11.0-alpha0-522-ga39cca1d5-fm-20240610.002-ga39cca1d Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <1537113c4396cd043a08a72bdca80cccfa2d54d9.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de> References: <20240620162316.3674955-1-arnd@kernel.org> <20240620162316.3674955-8-arnd@kernel.org> <1537113c4396cd043a08a72bdca80cccfa2d54d9.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de> Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 10:56:27 +0200 From: "Arnd Bergmann" To: "John Paul Adrian Glaubitz" , "Helge Deller" , "Arnd Bergmann" , Linux-Arch , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: "Thomas Bogendoerfer" , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" , "Andreas Larsson" , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, "Michael Ellerman" , "Nicholas Piggin" , "Christophe Leroy" , "Naveen N. Rao" , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "Brian Cain" , linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, guoren , "linux-csky@vger.kernel.org" , "Heiko Carstens" , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Rich Felker" , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , "Alexander Viro" , "Christian Brauner" , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, "Xi Ruoyao" , "musl@lists.openwall.com" , "LTP List" , "Adhemerval Zanella Netto" Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/15] parisc: use generic sys_fanotify_mark implementation Content-Type: text/plain On Fri, Jun 21, 2024, at 10:52, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Hi Helge and Arnd, > > On Thu, 2024-06-20 at 23:21 +0200, Helge Deller wrote: >> The patch looks good at first sight. >> I'll pick it up in my parisc git tree and will do some testing the >> next few days and then push forward for 6.11 when it opens.... > > Isn't this supposed to go in as one series or can arch maintainers actually > pick the patches for their architecture and merge them individually? > > If yes, I would prefer to do that for the SuperH patch as well as I usually > prefer merging SuperH patches in my own tree. The patches are all independent of one another, except for a couple of context changes where multiple patches touch the same lines. Feel free to pick up the sh patch directly, I'll just merge whatever is left in the end. I mainly want to ensure we can get all the bugfixes done for v6.10 so I can build my longer cleanup series on top of it for 6.11. Arnd