From: Nicolas Baranger <nicolas.baranger@3xo.fr>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
netfs@lists.linux.dev, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfs: Fix kernel async DIO
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2025 19:08:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bb21f2c816e75425c9200a7f9700d216@3xo.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <529745.1736261368@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Hi David
Sure you can !
Please also note that after building 'linux-next' and applying the first
patch you provide I sucessfully test DIO write (same test process as
before).
It works fine too !
I stay availiable for further testing
Thanks again for help (special thanks to Christoph and David)
Nicolas
Le 2025-01-07 15:49, David Howells a écrit :
> Thanks!
>
> I ported the patch to linus/master (see below) and it looks pretty much
> the
> same as yours, give or take tabs getting converted to spaces.
>
> Could I put you down as a Tested-by?
>
> David
>
> ---
> netfs: Fix kernel async DIO
>
> Netfslib needs to be able to handle kernel-initiated asynchronous DIO
> that
> is supplied with a bio_vec[] array. Currently, because of the async
> flag,
> this gets passed to netfs_extract_user_iter() which throws a warning
> and
> fails because it only handles IOVEC and UBUF iterators. This can be
> triggered through a combination of cifs and a loopback blockdev with
> something like:
>
> mount //my/cifs/share /foo
> dd if=/dev/zero of=/foo/m0 bs=4K count=1K
> losetup --sector-size 4096 --direct-io=on /dev/loop2046 /foo/m0
> echo hello >/dev/loop2046
>
> This causes the following to appear in syslog:
>
> WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 109 at fs/netfs/iterator.c:50
> netfs_extract_user_iter+0x170/0x250 [netfs]
>
> and the write to fail.
>
> Fix this by removing the check in netfs_unbuffered_write_iter_locked()
> that
> causes async kernel DIO writes to be handled as userspace writes. Note
> that this change relies on the kernel caller maintaining the existence
> of
> the bio_vec array (or kvec[] or folio_queue) until the op is complete.
>
> Fixes: 153a9961b551 ("netfs: Implement unbuffered/DIO write support")
> Reported by: Nicolas Baranger <nicolas.baranger@3xo.fr>
> Closes:
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/fedd8a40d54b2969097ffa4507979858@3xo.fr/
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> cc: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
> cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev
> cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org
> cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> fs/netfs/direct_write.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/netfs/direct_write.c b/fs/netfs/direct_write.c
> index 173e8b5e6a93..f9421f3e6d37 100644
> --- a/fs/netfs/direct_write.c
> +++ b/fs/netfs/direct_write.c
> @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ ssize_t netfs_unbuffered_write_iter_locked(struct
> kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *
> * allocate a sufficiently large bvec array and may shorten the
> * request.
> */
> - if (async || user_backed_iter(iter)) {
> + if (user_backed_iter(iter)) {
> n = netfs_extract_user_iter(iter, len, &wreq->iter, 0);
> if (n < 0) {
> ret = n;
> @@ -77,6 +77,11 @@ ssize_t netfs_unbuffered_write_iter_locked(struct
> kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *
> wreq->direct_bv_count = n;
> wreq->direct_bv_unpin = iov_iter_extract_will_pin(iter);
> } else {
> + /* If this is a kernel-generated async DIO request,
> + * assume that any resources the iterator points to
> + * (eg. a bio_vec array) will persist till the end of
> + * the op.
> + */
> wreq->iter = *iter;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-07 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <669f22fc89e45dd4e56d75876dc8f2bf@3xo.fr>
[not found] ` <fedd8a40d54b2969097ffa4507979858@3xo.fr>
2025-01-06 11:37 ` [PATCH] netfs: Fix kernel async DIO David Howells
2025-01-06 12:07 ` nicolas.baranger
2025-01-07 8:26 ` nicolas.baranger
2025-01-07 14:49 ` David Howells
2025-01-07 18:08 ` Nicolas Baranger [this message]
2025-01-06 15:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-20 8:46 ` [Linux 6.14 - netfs/cifs] loop on file cat + file copy Nicolas Baranger
2025-01-07 12:03 ` [PATCH] netfs: Fix kernel async DIO Paulo Alcantara
2025-01-07 18:39 David Howells
2025-01-09 16:19 ` Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bb21f2c816e75425c9200a7f9700d216@3xo.fr \
--to=nicolas.baranger@3xo.fr \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfs@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=smfrench@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox