From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] shmem: Apply a couple of filemap_splice_read() fixes to shmem_splice_read()
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 12:23:46 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bd497349-1cce-7c29-8b8f-d95f10e534e6@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230727161016.169066-3-dhowells@redhat.com>
On Thu, 27 Jul 2023, David Howells wrote:
> Fix shmem_splice_read() to use the inode from in->f_mapping->host rather
> than file_inode(in) and to skip the splice if it starts after s_maxbytes,
> analogously with fixes to filemap_splice_read().
>
> Fixes: bd194b187115 ("shmem: Implement splice-read")
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Thanks for trying to keep them in synch, but I already had to look into
both of these two "fixes" before sending my patch to Andrew, and neither
appears to be needed.
Neither of them does any harm either, but I think I'd prefer Andrew to
drop this patch from mm-unstable, just because it changes nothing.
Comment on each below...
> cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
> cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
> cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
> cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
> cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org
> cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
> cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
> ---
> mm/shmem.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
> index 0164cccdcd71..8a16d4c7092b 100644
> --- a/mm/shmem.c
> +++ b/mm/shmem.c
> @@ -2780,13 +2780,16 @@ static ssize_t shmem_file_splice_read(struct file *in, loff_t *ppos,
> struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
> size_t len, unsigned int flags)
> {
> - struct inode *inode = file_inode(in);
> + struct inode *inode = in->f_mapping->host;
Haha, it's years and years since I had to worry about that distinction:
I noticed you'd made that change in filemap, and had to refresh old
memories, before concluding that this change is not needed.
shmem_file_splice_read() is specified only in shmem_file_operations,
and shmem_file_operations is connected up only when S_IFREG; so block
and char device nodes will not ever arrive at shmem_file_splice_read().
And shmem does not appear to be out of step there: I did not search
through many filesystems, but it appeared to be normal that only the
regular files reach the splice_read.
Which made me wonder whether the file_inode -> f_mapping->host
change was appropriate elsewhere. Wouldn't the splice_read always
get called on the bd_inode? Ah, perhaps not: init_special_inode()
sets i_fop to def_blk_fops (for shmem and everyone else), and that
points to filemap_splice_read(), which explains why just that one
needs to pivot to f_mapping->host (I think).
> struct address_space *mapping = inode->i_mapping;
> struct folio *folio = NULL;
> size_t total_spliced = 0, used, npages, n, part;
> loff_t isize;
> int error = 0;
>
> + if (unlikely(*ppos >= inode->i_sb->s_maxbytes))
> + return 0;
> +
> /* Work out how much data we can actually add into the pipe */
> used = pipe_occupancy(pipe->head, pipe->tail);
> npages = max_t(ssize_t, pipe->max_usage - used, 0);
len = min_t(size_t, len, npages * PAGE_SIZE);
do {
if (*ppos >= i_size_read(inode))
break;
I've added to the context there, to show that the very first thing the
do loop does is check *ppos against i_size: so there's no need for that
preliminary check against s_maxbytes - something would be wrong already
if the file has grown beyond s_maxbytes.
So, thanks for the patch, but shmem does not need it.
Hugh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-27 19:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-27 16:10 [PATCH 0/2] shmem, splice: Fixes for shmem_splice_read() David Howells
2023-07-27 16:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] shmem: Fix splice of a missing page David Howells
2023-07-27 16:35 ` Andrew Morton
2023-07-27 16:47 ` David Howells
2023-07-27 18:45 ` Hugh Dickins
2023-07-27 19:49 ` David Howells
2023-07-27 16:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] shmem: Apply a couple of filemap_splice_read() fixes to shmem_splice_read() David Howells
2023-07-27 19:23 ` Hugh Dickins [this message]
2023-07-27 19:50 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bd497349-1cce-7c29-8b8f-d95f10e534e6@google.com \
--to=hughd@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).