From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com>,
chuck.lever@oracle.com, bfields@fieldses.org
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v17 01/11] fs/lock: add helper locks_owner_has_blockers to check for blockers
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 13:39:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bf53431f2a6a1f50d4f21f67722a207f582ecf29.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1647503028-11966-2-git-send-email-dai.ngo@oracle.com>
On Thu, 2022-03-17 at 00:43 -0700, Dai Ngo wrote:
> Add helper locks_owner_has_blockers to check if there is any blockers
> for a given lockowner.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com>
> ---
> fs/locks.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/fs.h | 7 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
> index 050acf8b5110..53864eb99dc5 100644
> --- a/fs/locks.c
> +++ b/fs/locks.c
> @@ -300,6 +300,34 @@ void locks_release_private(struct file_lock *fl)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(locks_release_private);
>
> +/**
> + * locks_owner_has_blockers - Check for blocking lock requests
> + * @flctx: file lock context
> + * @owner: lock owner
> + *
> + * Return values:
> + * %true: @owner has at least one blocker
> + * %false: @owner has no blockers
> + */
> +bool locks_owner_has_blockers(struct file_lock_context *flctx,
> + fl_owner_t owner)
> +{
> + struct file_lock *fl;
> +
> + spin_lock(&flctx->flc_lock);
> + list_for_each_entry(fl, &flctx->flc_posix, fl_list) {
> + if (fl->fl_owner != owner)
> + continue;
> + if (!list_empty(&fl->fl_blocked_requests)) {
> + spin_unlock(&flctx->flc_lock);
> + return true;
> + }
> + }
> + spin_unlock(&flctx->flc_lock);
> + return false;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(locks_owner_has_blockers);
> +
> /* Free a lock which is not in use. */
> void locks_free_lock(struct file_lock *fl)
> {
> diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> index 831b20430d6e..2057a9df790f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -1200,6 +1200,8 @@ extern void lease_unregister_notifier(struct notifier_block *);
> struct files_struct;
> extern void show_fd_locks(struct seq_file *f,
> struct file *filp, struct files_struct *files);
> +extern bool locks_owner_has_blockers(struct file_lock_context *flctx,
> + fl_owner_t owner);
> #else /* !CONFIG_FILE_LOCKING */
> static inline int fcntl_getlk(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
> struct flock __user *user)
> @@ -1335,6 +1337,11 @@ static inline int lease_modify(struct file_lock *fl, int arg,
> struct files_struct;
> static inline void show_fd_locks(struct seq_file *f,
> struct file *filp, struct files_struct *files) {}
> +static inline bool locks_owner_has_blockers(struct file_lock_context *flctx,
> + fl_owner_t owner)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> #endif /* !CONFIG_FILE_LOCKING */
>
> static inline struct inode *file_inode(const struct file *f)
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-17 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-17 7:43 [PATCH RFC v17 0/11] NFSD: Initial implementation of NFSv4 Courteous Server Dai Ngo
2022-03-17 7:43 ` [PATCH RFC v17 01/11] fs/lock: add helper locks_owner_has_blockers to check for blockers Dai Ngo
2022-03-17 15:04 ` Chuck Lever III
2022-03-17 17:39 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2022-03-17 17:46 ` Chuck Lever III
2022-03-17 7:43 ` [PATCH RFC v17 02/11] NFSD: Add courtesy client state, macro and spinlock to support courteous server Dai Ngo
2022-03-17 7:43 ` [PATCH RFC v17 03/11] NFSD: Add lm_lock_expired call out Dai Ngo
2022-03-17 7:43 ` [PATCH RFC v17 04/11] NFSD: Update nfsd_breaker_owns_lease() to handle courtesy clients Dai Ngo
2022-03-17 7:43 ` [PATCH RFC v17 05/11] NFSD: Update nfs4_get_vfs_file() to handle courtesy client Dai Ngo
2022-03-21 21:44 ` J. Bruce Fields
2022-03-23 0:42 ` dai.ngo
2022-03-17 7:43 ` [PATCH RFC v17 06/11] NFSD: Update find_clp_in_name_tree() " Dai Ngo
2022-03-22 21:50 ` J. Bruce Fields
2022-03-23 1:14 ` dai.ngo
2022-03-17 7:43 ` [PATCH RFC v17 07/11] NFSD: Update find_in_sessionid_hashtbl() " Dai Ngo
2022-03-17 7:43 ` [PATCH RFC v17 08/11] NFSD: Update find_client_in_id_table() " Dai Ngo
2022-03-17 7:43 ` [PATCH RFC v17 09/11] NFSD: Refactor nfsd4_laundromat() Dai Ngo
2022-03-17 7:43 ` [PATCH RFC v17 10/11] NFSD: Update laundromat to handle courtesy clients Dai Ngo
2022-03-17 15:03 ` Chuck Lever III
2022-03-17 17:51 ` dai.ngo
2022-03-17 7:43 ` [PATCH RFC v17 11/11] NFSD: Show state of courtesy clients in client info Dai Ngo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bf53431f2a6a1f50d4f21f67722a207f582ecf29.camel@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=dai.ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).