From: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@fastmail.fm>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 9/9] fuse: auto-invalidate inode attributes in passthrough mode
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 16:13:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c52a81b4-2e88-4a89-b2e5-fecbb3e3d03e@dorminy.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240206142453.1906268-10-amir73il@gmail.com>
On 2/6/24 09:24, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> After passthrough read/write, we invalidate a/c/mtime/size attributes
> if the backing inode attributes differ from FUSE inode attributes.
>
> Do the same in fuse_getattr() and after detach of backing inode, so that
> passthrough mmap read/write changes to a/c/mtime/size attribute of the
> backing inode will be propagated to the FUSE inode.
>
> The rules of invalidating a/c/mtime/size attributes with writeback cache
> are more complicated, so for now, writeback cache and passthrough cannot
> be enabled on the same filesystem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/fuse/dir.c | 4 ++++
> fs/fuse/fuse_i.h | 2 ++
> fs/fuse/inode.c | 4 ++++
> fs/fuse/iomode.c | 5 +++-
> fs/fuse/passthrough.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 5 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/dir.c b/fs/fuse/dir.c
> index 95330c2ca3d8..7f9d002b8f23 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/dir.c
> @@ -2118,6 +2118,10 @@ static int fuse_getattr(struct mnt_idmap *idmap,
> return -EACCES;
> }
>
> + /* Maybe update/invalidate attributes from backing inode */
> + if (fuse_inode_backing(get_fuse_inode(inode)))
> + fuse_backing_update_attr_mask(inode, request_mask);
> +
> return fuse_update_get_attr(inode, NULL, stat, request_mask, flags);
> }
>
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h b/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h
> index 98f878a52af1..4b011d31012f 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h
> +++ b/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h
> @@ -1456,6 +1456,8 @@ void fuse_backing_files_init(struct fuse_conn *fc);
> void fuse_backing_files_free(struct fuse_conn *fc);
> int fuse_backing_open(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct fuse_backing_map *map);
> int fuse_backing_close(struct fuse_conn *fc, int backing_id);
> +void fuse_backing_update_attr(struct inode *inode, struct fuse_backing *fb);
> +void fuse_backing_update_attr_mask(struct inode *inode, u32 request_mask);
>
> struct fuse_backing *fuse_passthrough_open(struct file *file,
> struct inode *inode,
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/inode.c b/fs/fuse/inode.c
> index c26a84439934..c68f005b6e86 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/inode.c
> @@ -1302,9 +1302,13 @@ static void process_init_reply(struct fuse_mount *fm, struct fuse_args *args,
> * on a stacked fs (e.g. overlayfs) themselves and with
> * max_stack_depth == 1, FUSE fs can be stacked as the
> * underlying fs of a stacked fs (e.g. overlayfs).
> + *
> + * For now, writeback cache and passthrough cannot be
> + * enabled on the same filesystem.
> */
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FUSE_PASSTHROUGH) &&
> (flags & FUSE_PASSTHROUGH) &&
> + !fc->writeback_cache &&
> arg->max_stack_depth > 0 &&
> arg->max_stack_depth <= FILESYSTEM_MAX_STACK_DEPTH) {
> fc->passthrough = 1;
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/iomode.c b/fs/fuse/iomode.c
> index c545058a01e1..96eb311fe7bd 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/iomode.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/iomode.c
> @@ -157,8 +157,11 @@ void fuse_file_uncached_io_end(struct inode *inode)
> spin_unlock(&fi->lock);
> if (!uncached_io)
> wake_up(&fi->direct_io_waitq);
> - if (oldfb)
> + if (oldfb) {
> + /* Maybe update attributes after detaching backing inode */
> + fuse_backing_update_attr(inode, oldfb);
> fuse_backing_put(oldfb);
> + }
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/passthrough.c b/fs/fuse/passthrough.c
> index 260e76fc72d5..c1bb80a6e536 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/passthrough.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/passthrough.c
> @@ -11,11 +11,8 @@
> #include <linux/backing-file.h>
> #include <linux/splice.h>
>
> -static void fuse_file_accessed(struct file *file)
> +static void fuse_backing_accessed(struct inode *inode, struct fuse_backing *fb)
> {
> - struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
> - struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
> - struct fuse_backing *fb = fuse_inode_backing(fi);
> struct inode *backing_inode = file_inode(fb->file);
> struct timespec64 atime = inode_get_atime(inode);
> struct timespec64 batime = inode_get_atime(backing_inode);
> @@ -25,11 +22,8 @@ static void fuse_file_accessed(struct file *file)
> fuse_invalidate_atime(inode);
> }
>
> -static void fuse_file_modified(struct file *file)
> +static void fuse_backing_modified(struct inode *inode, struct fuse_backing *fb)
> {
> - struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
> - struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
> - struct fuse_backing *fb = fuse_inode_backing(fi);
> struct inode *backing_inode = file_inode(fb->file);
> struct timespec64 ctime = inode_get_ctime(inode);
> struct timespec64 mtime = inode_get_mtime(inode);
> @@ -42,6 +36,51 @@ static void fuse_file_modified(struct file *file)
> fuse_invalidate_attr_mask(inode, FUSE_STATX_MODSIZE);
> }
>
> +/* Called from fuse_file_uncached_io_end() after detach of backing inode */
> +void fuse_backing_update_attr(struct inode *inode, struct fuse_backing *fb)
> +{
> + fuse_backing_modified(inode, fb);
> + fuse_backing_accessed(inode, fb);
> +}
> +
> +/* Called from fuse_getattr() - may race with detach of backing inode */
> +void fuse_backing_update_attr_mask(struct inode *inode, u32 request_mask)
> +{
> + struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
> + struct fuse_backing *fb;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + fb = fuse_backing_get(fuse_inode_backing(fi));
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + if (!fb)
> + return;
> +
> + if (request_mask & FUSE_STATX_MODSIZE)
> + fuse_backing_modified(inode, fb);
> + if (request_mask & STATX_ATIME)
> + fuse_backing_accessed(inode, fb);
> +
> + fuse_backing_put(fb);
> +}
> +
> +static void fuse_file_accessed(struct file *file)
> +{
> + struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
> + struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
> + struct fuse_backing *fb = fuse_inode_backing(fi);
> +
> + fuse_backing_accessed(inode, fb);
> +}
> +
> +static void fuse_file_modified(struct file *file)
> +{
> + struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
> + struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
> + struct fuse_backing *fb = fuse_inode_backing(fi);
> +
> + fuse_backing_modified(inode, fb);
> +}
> +
> ssize_t fuse_passthrough_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter)
> {
> struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;
I noticed this patch doesn't seem to have made it into 6.9 like the rest
of these passthrough patches -- may I ask why it didn't make it? I think
it still makes sense but I might be missing some change between what's
in 6.9 and this version of the patches.
Thanks!
Sweet Tea
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-02 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-06 14:24 [PATCH v15 0/9] FUSE passthrough for file io Amir Goldstein
2024-02-06 14:24 ` [PATCH v15 1/9] fuse: factor out helper for FUSE_DEV_IOC_CLONE Amir Goldstein
2024-02-06 14:24 ` [PATCH v15 2/9] fuse: introduce FUSE_PASSTHROUGH capability Amir Goldstein
2024-02-06 14:24 ` [PATCH v15 3/9] fuse: implement ioctls to manage backing files Amir Goldstein
2024-02-28 10:50 ` Jingbo Xu
2024-02-28 11:07 ` Amir Goldstein
2024-02-28 11:14 ` Miklos Szeredi
2024-02-28 11:28 ` Amir Goldstein
2024-02-28 14:32 ` Jens Axboe
2024-02-28 15:01 ` Miklos Szeredi
2024-02-28 15:05 ` Jens Axboe
2024-02-28 16:21 ` Amir Goldstein
2024-02-29 10:15 ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-29 10:17 ` Christian Brauner
2024-03-05 10:57 ` Miklos Szeredi
2024-02-28 13:22 ` Bernd Schubert
2024-02-06 14:24 ` [PATCH v15 4/9] fuse: prepare for opening file in passthrough mode Amir Goldstein
2024-02-06 14:24 ` [PATCH v15 5/9] fuse: implement open " Amir Goldstein
2024-02-06 14:24 ` [PATCH v15 6/9] fuse: implement read/write passthrough Amir Goldstein
2024-02-06 14:24 ` [PATCH v15 7/9] fuse: implement splice " Amir Goldstein
2024-02-06 14:24 ` [PATCH v15 8/9] fuse: implement passthrough for mmap Amir Goldstein
2024-02-06 14:24 ` [PATCH v15 9/9] fuse: auto-invalidate inode attributes in passthrough mode Amir Goldstein
2024-04-02 20:13 ` Sweet Tea Dorminy [this message]
2024-04-02 21:18 ` Bernd Schubert
2024-04-03 8:18 ` Amir Goldstein
2024-04-04 14:07 ` Sweet Tea Dorminy
2024-05-09 14:32 ` Amir Goldstein
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c52a81b4-2e88-4a89-b2e5-fecbb3e3d03e@dorminy.me \
--to=sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=bernd.schubert@fastmail.fm \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).