From: lijiang <lijiang@redhat.com>
To: "Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com>,
Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
Mike Anderson <andmike@linux.ibm.com>,
Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>, Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] fs/core/vmcore: Move sev_active() reference to x86 arch code
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 12:59:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c85ae8ff-3b7b-88bf-6b6a-c41b159c9cc2@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4a07bf75-b516-c81b-da7a-4b323e6d7e52@amd.com>
在 2019年07月19日 01:47, Lendacky, Thomas 写道:
> On 7/17/19 10:28 PM, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
>> Secure Encrypted Virtualization is an x86-specific feature, so it shouldn't
>> appear in generic kernel code because it forces non-x86 architectures to
>> define the sev_active() function, which doesn't make a lot of sense.
>>
>> To solve this problem, add an x86 elfcorehdr_read() function to override
>> the generic weak implementation. To do that, it's necessary to make
>> read_from_oldmem() public so that it can be used outside of vmcore.c.
>>
>> Also, remove the export for sev_active() since it's only used in files that
>> won't be built as modules.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
>
> Adding Lianbo and Baoquan, who recently worked on this, for their review.
>
This change looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Lianbo Jiang <lijiang@redhat.com>
Thanks.
Lianbo
> Thanks,
> Tom
>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kernel/crash_dump_64.c | 5 +++++
>> arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c | 1 -
>> fs/proc/vmcore.c | 8 ++++----
>> include/linux/crash_dump.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
>> include/linux/mem_encrypt.h | 1 -
>> 5 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/crash_dump_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/crash_dump_64.c
>> index 22369dd5de3b..045e82e8945b 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/crash_dump_64.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/crash_dump_64.c
>> @@ -70,3 +70,8 @@ ssize_t copy_oldmem_page_encrypted(unsigned long pfn, char *buf, size_t csize,
>> {
>> return __copy_oldmem_page(pfn, buf, csize, offset, userbuf, true);
>> }
>> +
>> +ssize_t elfcorehdr_read(char *buf, size_t count, u64 *ppos)
>> +{
>> + return read_from_oldmem(buf, count, ppos, 0, sev_active());
>> +}
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
>> index 7139f2f43955..b1e823441093 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
>> @@ -349,7 +349,6 @@ bool sev_active(void)
>> {
>> return sme_me_mask && sev_enabled;
>> }
>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(sev_active);
>>
>> /* Override for DMA direct allocation check - ARCH_HAS_FORCE_DMA_UNENCRYPTED */
>> bool force_dma_unencrypted(struct device *dev)
>> diff --git a/fs/proc/vmcore.c b/fs/proc/vmcore.c
>> index 57957c91c6df..ca1f20bedd8c 100644
>> --- a/fs/proc/vmcore.c
>> +++ b/fs/proc/vmcore.c
>> @@ -100,9 +100,9 @@ static int pfn_is_ram(unsigned long pfn)
>> }
>>
>> /* Reads a page from the oldmem device from given offset. */
>> -static ssize_t read_from_oldmem(char *buf, size_t count,
>> - u64 *ppos, int userbuf,
>> - bool encrypted)
>> +ssize_t read_from_oldmem(char *buf, size_t count,
>> + u64 *ppos, int userbuf,
>> + bool encrypted)
>> {
>> unsigned long pfn, offset;
>> size_t nr_bytes;
>> @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ void __weak elfcorehdr_free(unsigned long long addr)
>> */
>> ssize_t __weak elfcorehdr_read(char *buf, size_t count, u64 *ppos)
>> {
>> - return read_from_oldmem(buf, count, ppos, 0, sev_active());
>> + return read_from_oldmem(buf, count, ppos, 0, false);
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> diff --git a/include/linux/crash_dump.h b/include/linux/crash_dump.h
>> index f774c5eb9e3c..4664fc1871de 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/crash_dump.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/crash_dump.h
>> @@ -115,4 +115,18 @@ static inline int vmcore_add_device_dump(struct vmcoredd_data *data)
>> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> }
>> #endif /* CONFIG_PROC_VMCORE_DEVICE_DUMP */
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_VMCORE
>> +ssize_t read_from_oldmem(char *buf, size_t count,
>> + u64 *ppos, int userbuf,
>> + bool encrypted);
>> +#else
>> +static inline ssize_t read_from_oldmem(char *buf, size_t count,
>> + u64 *ppos, int userbuf,
>> + bool encrypted)
>> +{
>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +}
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_PROC_VMCORE */
>> +
>> #endif /* LINUX_CRASHDUMP_H */
>> diff --git a/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h b/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h
>> index 0c5b0ff9eb29..5c4a18a91f89 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h
>> @@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
>> #else /* !CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT */
>>
>> static inline bool mem_encrypt_active(void) { return false; }
>> -static inline bool sev_active(void) { return false; }
>>
>> #endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT */
>>
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-19 5:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-18 3:28 [PATCH v3 0/6] Remove x86-specific code from generic headers Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-18 3:28 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] x86,s390: Move ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT definition to arch/Kconfig Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-18 3:28 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] swiotlb: Remove call to sme_active() Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-18 8:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-18 17:26 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-07-18 3:28 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] dma-mapping: Remove dma_check_mask() Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-18 8:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-18 17:29 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-07-18 3:28 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] x86,s390/mm: Move sme_active() and sme_me_mask to x86-specific header Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-18 8:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-18 17:42 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-07-18 17:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-18 3:28 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] fs/core/vmcore: Move sev_active() reference to x86 arch code Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-18 8:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-18 17:47 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-07-19 4:59 ` lijiang [this message]
2019-07-19 15:47 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-18 3:28 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] s390/mm: Remove sev_active() function Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-18 8:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-18 13:01 ` Halil Pasic
2019-07-18 16:43 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-18 16:41 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-18 17:48 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] Remove x86-specific code from generic headers Lendacky, Thomas
2019-07-18 19:44 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-19 13:12 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-07-19 15:45 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c85ae8ff-3b7b-88bf-6b6a-c41b159c9cc2@redhat.com \
--to=lijiang@redhat.com \
--cc=Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=andmike@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bauerman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).