From: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
To: "frank.li@vivo.com" <frank.li@vivo.com>,
"glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de" <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>,
"slava@dubeyko.com" <slava@dubeyko.com>
Cc: "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 3/3] hfs: fix to update ctime after rename
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 01:37:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ca759782695a9e2195d39730edf939cadbe7016d.camel@ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3bbf9fe0b5e4b2fa26e472533e16a31c9d480903.camel@dubeyko.com>
On Tue, 2025-05-27 at 15:46 -0700, Viacheslav Dubeyko wrote:
> On Mon, 2025-05-19 at 10:52 -0600, Yangtao Li wrote:
> > Similar to hfsplus, let's update file ctime after the rename
> > operation
> > in hfs_rename().
> >
>
> Frankly speaking, I don't quite follow why should we update ctime
> during the rename operation. Why do we need to do this? What is the
> justification of this?
>
> And we still continue to operate by atime [1-4]. Should we do something
> with it?
>
> Thanks,
> Slava.
>
> [1]
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.15/source/fs/hfsplus/inode.c#L519
> [2]
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.15/source/fs/hfsplus/inode.c#L562
> [3]
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.15/source/fs/hfsplus/inode.c#L609
> [4]
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.15/source/fs/hfsplus/inode.c#L644
>
Sorry, I mean these links:
[1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.15/source/fs/hfs/sysdep.c#L35
[2] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.15/source/fs/hfs/sysdep.c#L36
[3] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.15/source/fs/hfs/inode.c#L357
[4] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.15/source/fs/hfs/inode.c#L368
Thanks,
Slava.
> > W/O patch(xfstest generic/003):
> >
> > +ERROR: access time has not been updated after accessing file1 first
> > time
> > +ERROR: access time has not been updated after accessing file2
> > +ERROR: access time has changed after modifying file1
> > +ERROR: change time has not been updated after changing file1
> > +ERROR: access time has not been updated after accessing file3
> > second time
> > +ERROR: access time has not been updated after accessing file3 third
> > time
> >
> > W/ patch(xfstest generic/003):
> >
> > +ERROR: access time has not been updated after accessing file1 first
> > time
> > +ERROR: access time has not been updated after accessing file2
> > +ERROR: access time has changed after modifying file1
> > +ERROR: access time has not been updated after accessing file3
> > second time
> > +ERROR: access time has not been updated after accessing file3 third
> > time
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
> > ---
> > fs/hfs/dir.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/hfs/dir.c b/fs/hfs/dir.c
> > index 86a6b317b474..756ea7b895e2 100644
> > --- a/fs/hfs/dir.c
> > +++ b/fs/hfs/dir.c
> > @@ -284,6 +284,7 @@ static int hfs_rename(struct mnt_idmap *idmap,
> > struct inode *old_dir,
> > struct dentry *old_dentry, struct inode
> > *new_dir,
> > struct dentry *new_dentry, unsigned int flags)
> > {
> > + struct inode *inode = d_inode(old_dentry);
> > int res;
> >
> > if (flags & ~RENAME_NOREPLACE)
> > @@ -296,14 +297,16 @@ static int hfs_rename(struct mnt_idmap *idmap,
> > struct inode *old_dir,
> > return res;
> > }
> >
> > - res = hfs_cat_move(d_inode(old_dentry)->i_ino,
> > - old_dir, &old_dentry->d_name,
> > + res = hfs_cat_move(inode->i_ino, old_dir, &old_dentry-
> > > d_name,
> > new_dir, &new_dentry->d_name);
> > - if (!res)
> > - hfs_cat_build_key(old_dir->i_sb,
> > - (btree_key
> > *)&HFS_I(d_inode(old_dentry))->cat_key,
> > - new_dir->i_ino, &new_dentry-
> > > d_name);
> > - return res;
> > + if (res)
> > + return res;
> > +
> > + hfs_cat_build_key(old_dir->i_sb, (btree_key *)&HFS_I(inode)-
> > > cat_key,
> > + new_dir->i_ino, &new_dentry->d_name);
> > + inode_set_ctime_current(inode);
> > + mark_inode_dirty(inode);
> > + return 0;
> > }
> >
> > const struct file_operations hfs_dir_operations = {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-28 1:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-19 16:52 [PATCH v2 1/3] hfsplus: fix to update ctime after rename Yangtao Li
2025-05-19 16:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] hfs: correct superblock flags Yangtao Li
2025-05-27 22:36 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2025-05-28 16:37 ` 回复: " 李扬韬
2025-05-28 21:26 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2025-05-29 2:25 ` Yangtao Li
2025-05-30 5:21 ` Christian Brauner
2025-05-30 7:50 ` Yangtao Li
2025-05-28 16:56 ` 回复: " 李扬韬
2025-05-28 17:04 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2025-05-19 16:52 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] hfs: fix to update ctime after rename Yangtao Li
2025-05-27 22:46 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2025-05-28 1:37 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko [this message]
2025-05-28 16:50 ` 回复: " 李扬韬
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ca759782695a9e2195d39730edf939cadbe7016d.camel@ibm.com \
--to=slava.dubeyko@ibm.com \
--cc=frank.li@vivo.com \
--cc=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=slava@dubeyko.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).