From: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: jack@suse.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] nowait aio: Introduce IOCB_FLAG_NOWAIT
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 10:57:17 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cc3fc6ee-c48d-1b51-59b7-1e322d10a561@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170301155634.GA9630@infradead.org>
On 03/01/2017 09:56 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 07:36:48AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> Given that we aren't validating aio_flags in older kernels we can't
>> just add this flag as it will be a no-op in older kernels. I think
>> we will have to add IOCB_CMD_PREADV2/IOCB_CMD_WRITEV2 opcodes that
>> properly validate all reserved fields or flags first.
>>
>> Once we do that I'd really prefer to use the same flags values
>> as preadv2/pwritev2 so that we'll only need one set of flags over
>> sync/async read/write ops.
>
> I just took another look and we do verify that
> aio_reserved1/aio_reserved2 must be zero. So I think we can just
> stick RWF_* into aio_reserved1 and fix that problem that way.
>
RWF_* ? Isn't that kernel space flags? Or did you intend to say
IOCB_FLAG_*? If yes, we maintain two flag fields? aio_reserved1 (perhaps
renamed to aio_flags2) and aio_flags?
aio_reserved1 is also used to return key for the purpose of io_cancel,
but we should be able to fetch the flags before putting the key value
there. Still I am not comfortable using the same field for it because it
will be overwritten when io_submit returns.
Which brings me to the next question: What is the purpose of aio_key?
Why is aio_key set to KIOCB_KEY (which is zero) every time? You are not
differentiating the request by setting all the iocb's key to zero.
--
Goldwyn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-01 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-28 23:36 [PATCH 0/8 v2] Non-blocking AIO Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-02-28 23:36 ` [PATCH 1/8] nowait aio: Introduce IOCB_FLAG_NOWAIT Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-03-01 15:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-03-01 15:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-03-01 16:57 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues [this message]
2017-03-01 22:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-28 23:36 ` [PATCH 2/8] nowait aio: Return if cannot get hold of i_rwsem Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-03-01 15:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-28 23:36 ` [PATCH 3/8] nowait aio: return if direct write will trigger writeback Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-03-01 3:46 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-03-01 15:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-03-02 10:38 ` Jan Kara
2017-03-02 14:12 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-03-02 15:22 ` Jan Kara
2017-02-28 23:36 ` [PATCH 4/8] nowait aio: Introduce IOMAP_NOWAIT Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-02-28 23:36 ` [PATCH 5/8] nowait aio: return on congested block device Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-03-08 7:03 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-03-08 15:00 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-03-08 15:28 ` Jan Kara
2017-03-08 15:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-03-08 16:17 ` Jens Axboe
2017-03-09 2:18 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-02-28 23:36 ` [PATCH 6/8] nowait aio: ext4 Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-02-28 23:36 ` [PATCH 7/8] nowait aio: xfs Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-03-01 15:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-28 23:36 ` [PATCH 8/8] nowait aio: btrfs Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-03-05 14:56 ` [PATCH 0/8 v2] Non-blocking AIO Avi Kivity
2017-03-06 8:25 ` Jan Kara
2017-03-06 8:40 ` Avi Kivity
2017-03-06 15:19 ` Jens Axboe
2017-03-06 15:29 ` Avi Kivity
2017-03-06 15:38 ` Jens Axboe
2017-03-06 15:59 ` Avi Kivity
2017-03-06 16:08 ` Jens Axboe
2017-03-06 16:59 ` Avi Kivity
2017-03-06 17:06 ` Jens Axboe
2017-03-06 18:17 ` Avi Kivity
2017-03-06 18:27 ` Jens Axboe
2017-03-06 18:50 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cc3fc6ee-c48d-1b51-59b7-1e322d10a561@suse.de \
--to=rgoldwyn@suse.de \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).