From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
To: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, minchan@kernel.org, david@redhat.com,
Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, rppt@kernel.org, pfalcato@suse.de,
kernel-team@android.com, android-mm@google.com,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] mm: fix off-by-one error in VMA count limit checks
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 14:53:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cce3596e-101c-4da2-8e88-1fa2fd943fb7@lucifer.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250915163838.631445-2-kaleshsingh@google.com>
On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 09:36:32AM -0700, Kalesh Singh wrote:
> The VMA count limit check in do_mmap() and do_brk_flags() uses a
> strict inequality (>), which allows a process's VMA count to exceed
> the configured sysctl_max_map_count limit by one.
>
> A process with mm->map_count == sysctl_max_map_count will incorrectly
> pass this check and then exceed the limit upon allocation of a new VMA
> when its map_count is incremented.
>
> Other VMA allocation paths, such as split_vma(), already use the
> correct, inclusive (>=) comparison.
Nice spot :)
And also 'doh!'
>
> Fix this bug by changing the comparison to be inclusive in do_mmap()
> and do_brk_flags(), bringing them in line with the correct behavior
> of other allocation paths.
>
> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Cc: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
> Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
> Cc: Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>
> Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
LGTM, so:
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
> ---
>
> Chnages in v2:
> - Fix mmap check, per Pedro
>
> mm/mmap.c | 2 +-
> mm/vma.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
> index 7306253cc3b5..e5370e7fcd8f 100644
> --- a/mm/mmap.c
> +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> @@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ unsigned long do_mmap(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
> return -EOVERFLOW;
>
> /* Too many mappings? */
> - if (mm->map_count > sysctl_max_map_count)
> + if (mm->map_count >= sysctl_max_map_count)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> /*
> diff --git a/mm/vma.c b/mm/vma.c
> index 3b12c7579831..033a388bc4b1 100644
> --- a/mm/vma.c
> +++ b/mm/vma.c
> @@ -2772,7 +2772,7 @@ int do_brk_flags(struct vma_iterator *vmi, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> if (!may_expand_vm(mm, vm_flags, len >> PAGE_SHIFT))
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - if (mm->map_count > sysctl_max_map_count)
> + if (mm->map_count >= sysctl_max_map_count)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> if (security_vm_enough_memory_mm(mm, len >> PAGE_SHIFT))
> --
> 2.51.0.384.g4c02a37b29-goog
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-18 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-15 16:36 [PATCH v2 0/7] vma count: fixes, test and improvements Kalesh Singh
2025-09-15 16:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] mm: fix off-by-one error in VMA count limit checks Kalesh Singh
2025-09-15 22:36 ` Andrew Morton
2025-09-16 14:20 ` Jonathan Corbet
2025-09-17 1:16 ` Andrew Morton
2025-09-16 9:45 ` Pedro Falcato
2025-09-17 7:44 ` SeongJae Park
2025-09-17 10:52 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-18 11:31 ` Pedro Falcato
2025-09-18 13:53 ` Lorenzo Stoakes [this message]
2025-09-15 16:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] mm/selftests: add max_vma_count tests Kalesh Singh
2025-09-17 10:58 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-17 16:49 ` Kalesh Singh
2025-09-18 14:42 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-09-18 16:21 ` Kalesh Singh
2025-09-15 16:36 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] mm: introduce vma_count_remaining() Kalesh Singh
2025-09-17 13:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-17 17:10 ` Kalesh Singh
2025-09-18 13:20 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-09-18 13:26 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-09-18 14:31 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-09-18 15:52 ` Kalesh Singh
2025-09-15 16:36 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] mm: rename mm_struct::map_count to vma_count Kalesh Singh
2025-09-17 13:41 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-18 11:46 ` Pedro Falcato
2025-09-18 14:48 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-09-15 16:36 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] mm: harden vma_count against direct modification Kalesh Singh
2025-09-18 14:52 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-09-18 15:43 ` Kalesh Singh
2025-09-15 16:36 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] mm: add assertion for VMA count limit Kalesh Singh
2025-09-17 13:44 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-17 17:22 ` Kalesh Singh
2025-09-17 18:34 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-17 20:31 ` Kalesh Singh
2025-09-18 11:48 ` Pedro Falcato
2025-09-18 13:30 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-09-15 16:36 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] mm/tracing: introduce max_vma_count_exceeded trace event Kalesh Singh
2025-09-15 23:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-09-16 1:19 ` Kalesh Singh
2025-09-16 15:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-09-16 17:36 ` Kalesh Singh
2025-09-16 17:48 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-09-16 17:57 ` Kalesh Singh
2025-09-16 18:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-09-16 18:23 ` Kalesh Singh
2025-09-16 18:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-09-16 20:08 ` Kalesh Singh
2025-09-18 11:38 ` Pedro Falcato
2025-09-18 14:48 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-09-18 13:42 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-09-18 13:51 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-09-18 15:55 ` Kalesh Singh
2025-09-15 22:34 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] vma count: fixes, test and improvements Andrew Morton
2025-09-15 23:10 ` Kalesh Singh
2025-09-16 0:05 ` Andrew Morton
2025-09-16 1:23 ` Kalesh Singh
2025-09-16 10:12 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-09-16 17:47 ` Kalesh Singh
2025-09-17 2:16 ` Andrew Morton
2025-09-17 5:36 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-09-17 23:32 ` Andrew Morton
2025-09-18 10:29 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-09-18 12:07 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-18 12:49 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-09-18 20:59 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cce3596e-101c-4da2-8e88-1fa2fd943fb7@lucifer.local \
--to=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=android-mm@google.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).