From: Gang Li <ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
songmuchun@bytedance.com, zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] sched/numa: add per-process numa_balancing
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2022 16:08:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cf52d7d3-e7f8-2b4e-a752-8be8d95b31fb@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211206024530.11336-1-ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com>
Hi,
Any comments please?
;)
On 2021/12/6 10:45, Gang Li wrote:
> This patch add a new api PR_NUMA_BALANCING in prctl.
>
> A large number of page faults will cause performance loss when numa
> balancing is performing. Thus those processes which care about worst-case
> performance need numa balancing disabled. Others, on the contrary, allow a
> temporary performance loss in exchange for higher average performance, so
> enable numa balancing is better for them.
>
> Numa balancing can only be controlled globally by
> /proc/sys/kernel/numa_balancing. Due to the above case, we want to
> disable/enable numa_balancing per-process instead.
>
> Add numa_balancing under mm_struct. Then use it in task_tick_fair.
>
> Set per-process numa balancing:
> prctl(PR_NUMA_BALANCING, PR_SET_NUMAB_DISABLE); //disable
> prctl(PR_NUMA_BALANCING, PR_SET_NUMAB_ENABLE); //enable
> prctl(PR_NUMA_BALANCING, PR_SET_NUMAB_DEFAULT); //follow global
> Get numa_balancing state:
> prctl(PR_NUMA_BALANCING, PR_GET_NUMAB, &ret);
> cat /proc/<pid>/status | grep NumaB_enabled
>
> Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Gang Li <ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Fix compile error.
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Now PR_NUMA_BALANCING support three states: enabled, disabled, default.
> enabled and disabled will ignore global setting, and default will follow
> global setting.
--
Thanks
Gang Li
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-06 8:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-06 2:45 [PATCH v3] sched/numa: add per-process numa_balancing Gang Li
2021-12-13 6:49 ` Gang Li
2022-01-06 8:08 ` Gang Li [this message]
2022-01-12 14:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-02-08 3:46 ` Gang Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cf52d7d3-e7f8-2b4e-a752-8be8d95b31fb@bytedance.com \
--to=ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).