From: Dongsu Park <dongsu@kinvolk.io>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Alban Crequy <alban@kinvolk.io>,
Dongsu Park <dongsu@kinvolk.io>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 0/2] ima,fuse: introduce new fs flag FS_IMA_NO_CACHE
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 19:06:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1517314847.git.dongsu@kinvolk.io> (raw)
This patchset v4 introduces a new fs flag FS_IMA_NO_CACHE and uses it in
FUSE. This forces files to be re-measured, re-appraised and re-audited
on file systems with the feature flag FS_IMA_NO_CACHE. In that way,
cached integrity results won't be used.
There was a previous attempt (unmerged) with a IMA option named "force" and using
that option for FUSE filesystems. These patches use a different approach
so that the IMA subsystem does not need to know about FUSE.
- https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-integrity/msg00948.html
- https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1584131.html
Changes since v1: https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1587390.html
- include linux-fsdevel mailing list in cc
- mark patch as RFC
- based on next-integrity, without other unmerged FUSE / IMA patches
Changes since v2: https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1587678.html
- rename flag to FS_IMA_NO_CACHE
- split patch into 2
Changes since v3: https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1592393.html
- make the code simpler by resetting IMA_DONE_MASK
The patchset is also available in our github repo:
https://github.com/kinvolk/linux/tree/dongsu/fuse-flag-ima-nocache-v4
Alban Crequy (2):
fuse: introduce new fs_type flag FS_IMA_NO_CACHE
ima: force re-appraisal on filesystems with FS_IMA_NO_CACHE
fs/fuse/inode.c | 2 +-
include/linux/fs.h | 1 +
security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--
2.13.6
next reply other threads:[~2018-01-30 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-30 18:06 Dongsu Park [this message]
2018-01-30 18:06 ` [RFC PATCH v4 1/2] fuse: introduce new fs_type flag FS_IMA_NO_CACHE Dongsu Park
2018-02-02 15:20 ` Mimi Zohar
2018-02-02 15:33 ` Mimi Zohar
2018-02-02 16:10 ` Miklos Szeredi
2018-02-02 16:59 ` Mimi Zohar
2018-02-05 14:16 ` Alban Crequy
2018-02-07 9:21 ` Miklos Szeredi
2018-02-07 13:05 ` Mimi Zohar
2018-01-30 18:06 ` [RFC PATCH v4 2/2] ima: force re-appraisal on filesystems with FS_IMA_NO_CACHE Dongsu Park
2018-02-01 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH v4 0/2] ima,fuse: introduce new fs flag FS_IMA_NO_CACHE Mimi Zohar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1517314847.git.dongsu@kinvolk.io \
--to=dongsu@kinvolk.io \
--cc=alban@kinvolk.io \
--cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mszeredi@redhat.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=seth.forshee@canonical.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).