Linux filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bryam Vargas <hexlabsecurity@proton.me>
To: Anders Larsen <al@alarsen.net>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] fs/qnx4: fix bh leak and extent-count OOB read in qnx4_block_map()
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2026 08:21:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1780733712.git.hexlabsecurity@proton.me> (raw)

While reviewing qnx4_block_map() I found two issues in how it handles a
freshly sb_bread()'d extent block (struct qnx4_xblk):

  1/2: the "IamXblk" signature-mismatch error path returns without
       releasing the buffer head (a leak on every malformed extent block);

  2/2: the per-block extent count xblk_num_xtnts (on-disk u8, up to 255)
       is used as the walk's loop bound but is never checked against the
       fixed QNX4_MAX_XTNTS_PER_XBLK (60) array size, so a crafted image
       can make the walk read past xblk_xtnts[60] / past the 512-byte
       extent block (CWE-125 out-of-bounds read).

Both are reachable only by mounting a crafted qnx4 image (mounting needs
CAP_SYS_ADMIN; qnx4 is not unprivileged-userns mountable), so the practical
impact is robustness/hardening: a buffer-head leak and a bounded read past
the extent block. Patch 2 is the security-relevant one.

The OOB read was confirmed with KASAN (the on-disk block is 512 bytes;
reproduced on a kmalloc(512) copy of the walk -> "slab-out-of-bounds Read
4 bytes to the right of the 512-byte region"; a live mount packs the 512B
block in a 4096B page-cache page, which hides the over-read from KASAN
there) and with an ABI-invariant (-m64/-m32) AddressSanitizer extraction.
Both are fixed by rejecting the malformed block early.

Bryam Vargas (2):
  fs/qnx4: release the buffer head on an invalid extent-block signature
  fs/qnx4: validate the extent count before walking the extent block

 fs/qnx4/inode.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)


base-commit: 43370e89f7a896a583bf33d1cd171d02630e61bf
-- 
2.43.0



             reply	other threads:[~2026-06-06  8:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-06  8:21 Bryam Vargas [this message]
2026-06-06  8:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] fs/qnx4: release the buffer head on an invalid extent-block signature Bryam Vargas
2026-06-06  8:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] fs/qnx4: validate the extent count before walking the extent block Bryam Vargas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cover.1780733712.git.hexlabsecurity@proton.me \
    --to=hexlabsecurity@proton.me \
    --cc=al@alarsen.net \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox