From: 谢纲 <xiegang112@gmail.com>
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ordered I/O with multipath
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 22:53:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d364733c0904080753m3454adbfqa05ba11b916651dc@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090408143054.GB3841@shareable.org>
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org> wrote:
> 谢纲 wrote:
>> Some journal filesystem use barrier i/o to ensure the order of the
>> committing data. But if the filesystem is on the top of volume manager
>> which support the raid and multipath. The barrier i/o might not be
>> handled correctly. How does journal filesystem deal with this?
>
> For software RAID and multipath, I think it isn't handled at all.
>
> Even if you disable write-caching in the underlying storage, ordered
> requests may not retain their order, so the common database advice to
> disable write-cache and use SCSI or SATA-NCQ may not work either.
>
> If the RAID code is changed to handle barriers, that would still have
> possible "scattershot" corruption on RAID-5, because writing a single
> sector on the logical device affects more than one visible sector if
> it is interrupted. In other words, the "radius of corruption" is
> bigger than one sector for RAID-5, and it's not contiguous either.
If there is volume manager, which control the raid and could
understand the multipath, I think the barriers can be handled.
Because, the it can get all the information about where those i/o
goes. But it's very complicated to handle all of this.
It's said that the Veritas volume manager could handle this. I don't
know whether it's true. but according to the linux block layer, it's
really had to implement this.
>
> In principle, journalling filesystems need to know the "radius of
> corruption" to provide robust journalling. If individual sector
> writes are atomic, this isn't an issue. Some people think sector
> writes are atomic on modern hard drives (but I wouldn't count on it).
> But it is definitely not atomic when writing to a RAID or multipath if
> the write affects more than one device.
>
> -- Jamie
>
--
Xie Gang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-08 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-08 4:59 ordered I/O with multipath 谢纲
2009-04-08 14:30 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-04-08 14:53 ` 谢纲 [this message]
2009-04-09 18:32 ` Bryan Henderson
2009-04-09 20:00 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-04-10 16:42 ` Bryan Henderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d364733c0904080753m3454adbfqa05ba11b916651dc@mail.gmail.com \
--to=xiegang112@gmail.com \
--cc=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).