From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware_loader: simplfy builtin or module check
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 23:03:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <da39d895-61fc-5ca2-64e0-e31e20e98245@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK7LNARiDFpphJrhk5q00d5sSPWAQ2mMLu8Z2YP0Xwk=3WGt3w@mail.gmail.com>
On 1/11/22 22:56, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 3:37 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 1/11/22 18:34, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
>>> The existing check is outdated and confuses developers. Use the
>>> already existing IS_ENABLED() defined on kconfig.h which makes
>>> the intention much clearer.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
>>> Reported-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
>>
>> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>> ---
>>> include/linux/firmware.h | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/firmware.h b/include/linux/firmware.h
>>> index 3b057dfc8284..fa3493dbe84a 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/firmware.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/firmware.h
>>> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ static inline bool firmware_request_builtin(struct firmware *fw,
>>> }
>>> #endif
>>>
>>> -#if defined(CONFIG_FW_LOADER) || (defined(CONFIG_FW_LOADER_MODULE) && defined(MODULE))
>>
>> The "defined(MODULE)" part wasn't needed here. :)
>
>
>
> It _is_ needed.
>
> This seems to be equivalent to IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_FW_LOADER),
> not IS_ENABLE(CONFIG_FW_LOADER).
>
Hm, /me confused.
How can CONFIG_FW_LOADER_MODULE be =y when MODULE is not defined?
>
>
>>
>>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FW_LOADER)
>>> int request_firmware(const struct firmware **fw, const char *name,
>>> struct device *device);
>>> int firmware_request_nowarn(const struct firmware **fw, const char *name,
>>
>> --
>> ~Randy
>
>
>
--
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-12 7:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-12 2:34 [PATCH] firmware_loader: simplfy builtin or module check Luis Chamberlain
2022-01-12 6:37 ` Randy Dunlap
2022-01-12 6:56 ` Masahiro Yamada
2022-01-12 7:03 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2022-01-12 7:36 ` Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=da39d895-61fc-5ca2-64e0-e31e20e98245@infradead.org \
--to=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).