linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>,
	Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] powerpc/vdso: Wire up getrandom() vDSO implementation on PPC64
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 16:27:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dac37bce-9616-450c-8c1e-aa24dcbfb882@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZtXJfiA1lU55JLMM@zx2c4.com>

Hi Jason, hi Michael,

Le 02/09/2024 à 16:19, Jason A. Donenfeld a écrit :
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 04:16:48PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> Can do that, but there will still be a problem with chacha selftests if
>> I don't opt-out the entire function content when it is ppc64. It will
>> build properly but if someone runs it on a ppc64 it will likely crash
>> because only the low 32 bits of registers will be saved.
> 
> What if you don't wire up the selftests _at all_ until the ppc64 commit?
> Then there'll be no risk.
> 
> (And I think I would prefer to see the 32-bit code all in the 32-bit
> commit; that'd make it more straight forward to review too.)

I'd be fine with that but I'd like feedback from Michael on it: Is there 
a risk to only get PPC32 part merged as a first step or will both PPC32 
and PPC64 go together anyway ?

I would prefer not to delay PPC32 because someone doesn't feel confident 
with PPC64.

Christophe

  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-02 14:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-02 12:04 [PATCH v4 0/5] Wire up getrandom() vDSO implementation on powerpc Christophe Leroy
2024-09-02 12:04 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] mm: Define VM_DROPPABLE for powerpc/32 Christophe Leroy
2024-09-02 12:04 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] powerpc/vdso32: Add crtsavres Christophe Leroy
2024-09-02 12:04 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] powerpc/vdso: Refactor CFLAGS for CVDSO build Christophe Leroy
2024-09-02 12:04 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] powerpc/vdso: Wire up getrandom() vDSO implementation on PPC32 Christophe Leroy
2024-09-02 12:34   ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2024-09-02 13:07     ` Christophe Leroy
2024-09-02 12:04 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] powerpc/vdso: Wire up getrandom() vDSO implementation on PPC64 Christophe Leroy
2024-09-02 12:41   ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2024-09-02 13:12     ` Christophe Leroy
2024-09-02 14:00       ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2024-09-02 14:16         ` Christophe Leroy
2024-09-02 14:19           ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2024-09-02 14:27             ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
2024-09-02 14:37               ` Jason A. Donenfeld

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dac37bce-9616-450c-8c1e-aa24dcbfb882@csgroup.eu \
    --to=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=justinstitt@google.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=morbo@google.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=naveen@kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=xry111@xry111.site \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).